Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture — A Biomechanical Comparison Between Vancouver Type B1 and B2 Fixation Methods
- 31 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Vol. 29 (3), 495-500
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.010
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral componentThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2009
- Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Vancouver Type-B1 Periprosthetic Femoral FracturesThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2007
- Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with the non-contact bridging plate: a new angular stable implantArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2007
- Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femurThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
- Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Classification and Demographics of 1049 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty RegisterThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2005
- Indirect Reduction and Plate Fixation, without Grafting, for Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures About a Stable Intramedullary ImplantJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2005
- Treatment Protocol for Proximal Femoral Periprosthetic FracturesThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2004
- Dall-Miles plates for periprosthetic femoral fractures: A critical review of 16 casesInjury, 2003
- PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES AROUND WELL-FIXED IMPLANTSJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2002
- Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after hip arthroplasty: A statistical analysis of outcome based on 487 patientsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1994