Similar nociceptive afferents mediate psychophysical and electrophysiological responses to heat stimulation of glabrous and hairy skin in humans
- 8 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal Of Physiology-London
- Vol. 577 (1), 235-248
- https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.115675
Abstract
The ability to perceive and withdraw rapidly from noxious environmental stimuli is crucial for survival. When heat stimuli are applied to primate hairy skin, first pain sensation is mediated by type-II A-fibre nociceptors (II-AMHs). In contrast, the reported absence of first pain and II-AMH microneurographical responses when heat stimuli are applied to the hand palm has led to the notion that II-AMHs are lacking in this primate glabrous skin. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of hairy and glabrous skin stimulation on neural transmission of nociceptive inputs elicited by different kinds of thermal heating. We recorded psychophysical and EEG brain responses to radiant (laser-evoked potentials, LEPs) and contact heat stimuli (contact heat-evoked potentials, CHEPs) delivered to the dorsum and the palm of the hand in normal volunteers. Brain responses were analysed at a single-trial level, using an automated approach based on multiple linear regression. Laser stimulation of hairy and glabrous skin at the same energy elicited remarkably similar psychophysical ratings and LEPs. This finding provides strong evidence that first pain to heat does exist in glabrous skin, and suggests that similar nociceptive afferents, with the physiological properties of II-AMHs, mediate first pain to heat stimulation of glabrous and hairy skin in humans. In contrast, when contact heat stimuli were employed, a significantly higher nominal temperature had to be applied to glabrous skin in order to achieve psychophysical ratings similar to those obtained following hairy skin stimulation, and CHEPs following glabrous skin stimulation had significantly longer latencies (N2 wave, +25%; P2 wave, +24%) and smaller amplitudes (N2 wave, -40%; P2 wave, -44%) than CHEPs following hairy skin stimulation. Irrespective of the stimulated territory, CHEPs always had significantly longer latencies (hairy skin N2 wave, +75%; P2 wave, +56%) and smaller amplitudes (hairy skin N2 wave, -42%; P2 wave, -19%) than LEPs. These findings are consistent with the thickness-dependent delay and attenuation of the temperature waveform at nociceptor depth when conductive heating is applied, and suggest that the previously reported lack of first pain and microneurographical II-AMH responses following glabrous skin stimulation could have been the result of a search bias consequent to the use of long-wavelength radiant heating (i.e. CO2 laser) as stimulation procedure.This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Automated single-trial measurement of amplitude and latency of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) using multiple linear regressionClinical Neurophysiology, 2006
- Laser guns and hot platesPain, 2005
- Aδ nociceptor response to laser stimuli: selective effect of stimulus duration on skin temperature, brain potentials and pain perceptionClinical Neurophysiology, 2004
- In vivo epidermal thickness measurement: ultrasound vs. confocal imagingSkin Research and Technology, 2004
- Unmyelinated trigeminal pathways as assessed by laser stimuli in humansBrain, 2003
- CO2 laser activation of nociceptive and non-nociceptive thermal afferents from hairy and glabrous skinPain, 1996
- Apparent hyperalgesia after lesions of the descending serotonergic pathways is due to increased tail skin temperaturePain, 1988
- The thickness of the epidermisBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1973
- THE RADIATION OF HEAT FROM THE HUMAN BODY. IV. THE EMISSION, REFLECTION, AND TRANSMISSION OF INFRA-RED RADIATION BY THE HUMAN SKINJCI Insight, 1934