Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Open Access
- 28 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 349 (6251), aac4716
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Abstract
Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams.Keywords
Funding Information
- Laura and John Arnold Foundation
- Center for Open Science
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth TellingPsychological Science, 2012
- Raise standards for preclinical cancer researchNature, 2012
- Tracking Replicability as a Method of Post-Publication Open EvaluationFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2012
- What Kind of Empirical Research Should We Publish, Fund, and Reward?: A Different PerspectivePerspectives on Psychological Science, 2009
- The Best Men Are (Not Always) Already TakenPsychological Science, 2008
- Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic ExplanationPhilosophy of Science, 1968