Evaluating complex and unfolding interventions in real time
- 22 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation
- Vol. 18 (1), 79-91
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011429629
Abstract
This article discusses an approach to managing the evaluation of complex interventions. Complex interventions pose significant challenges to the role and conduct of evaluations. In particular, they combine with reflexive learning and change to produce significant uncertainties making it hard to describe in advance what the intervention will do or what the outcomes might be. These uncertainties vary in nature and addressing these uncertainties leads to different evaluation approaches. That such evaluations often take place in ‘real time’ and have a strong formative dimension adds to the challenge. This article proposes a way of approaching this problem by incorporating the concepts of uncertainty and complexity into a Theory of Change-based approach.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perturbing ongoing conversations about systems and complexity in health services and systemsJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2009
- New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventionsBMJ, 2008
- Is Realist Evaluation a Realistic Approach for Complex Reforms?Evaluation, 2008
- Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health careBMJ, 2007
- Wanted--new methodologies for health service research. Is complexity theory the answer?Family Practice, 2006
- Using complexity theory to build interventions that improve health care delivery in primary careJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- The Complex Systems See-Change in EducationJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2006
- Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2005
- Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be?BMJ, 2004
- The dominant logic: Retrospective and extensionStrategic Management Journal, 1995