Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Organization Science
- Vol. 12 (5), 612-631
- https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.612.10096
Abstract
This study describes the image of organizing that underlies a complex organization's ability to incorporate streams of innovation with continuing operations. I argue that a mechanistic organization archetype prevents people from seeing in their minds' eyes—from imagining—how to do the work of innovation organizationwide, but that theorists have failed to articulate an alternative to this archetype in its own terms. The study focuses on two elements of organizing: the differentiation and the integration of work. I build grounded theory for an alternate, innovative archetype of organizing by exploring the shared image of work differentiation and integration in twelve firms that vary in innovative ability. I find a fundamentally different image in innovative organizations that is centered on hands-on practice: People understand value creation as a long-term working relationship with customers, in which they apply the firm's skills to anticipate and solve customer problems. This practice is differentiated into distinct problems in value creation, each of which embodies the integral flow of work like a lateral slice, but which situates those problems in their own contexts. People understand themselves to be organized in an autonomous community of practice that takes charge of one of the problems. The communities of practice are integrated by standards for action: vivid, simple representations of value that frame work and that are reenacted in practice. The analysis details this different image of organizing by describing four autonomous communities of practice and contrasting them with the image of organizing found in noninnovative firms. The paper illustrates how this new image straightforwardly organizes and controls innovative work, and how the noninnovative image of differentiation and integration makes this work unimaginable. I conclude that innovation can be incorporated with continuing operations, provided that managers and theorists reimagine the differentiation and integration of work. I offer preliminary ideas for doing so, and suggest some next steps in this research stream.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organizational Improvisation and Organizational MemoryAcademy of Management Review, 1998
- The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing together the Old and the New InstitutionalismAcademy of Management Review, 1996
- Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational StudiesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1996
- Managing Product Definition in High-Technology Industries: A Pilot StudyCalifornia Management Review, 1994
- A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovationStrategic Management Journal, 1992
- Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusionStrategic Management Journal, 1990
- Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established FirmsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1990
- Organizational Design Types, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic ChangeOrganization Studies, 1988
- Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious OrderAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1984