Three strategically placed hydrogen-bonding residues convert a proton pump into a sensory receptor
- 31 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 103 (44), 16129-16134
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607467103
Abstract
In haloarchaea, light-driven ion transporters have been modified by evolution to produce sensory receptors that relay light signals to transducer proteins controlling motility behavior. The proton pump bacteriorhodopsin and the phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) differ by 74% of their residues, with nearly all conserved residues within the photoreactive retinal-binding pocket in the membrane-embedded center of the proteins. Here, we show that three residues in bacteriorhodopsin replaced by the corresponding residues in SRII enable bacteriorhodopsin to efficiently relay the retinal photoisomerization signal to the SRII integral membrane transducer (HtrII) and induce robust phototaxis responses. A single replacement (Ala-215-Thr), bridging the retinal and the membrane-embedded surface, confers weak phototaxis signaling activity, and the additional two (surface substitutions Pro-200-Thr and Val-210-Tyr), expected to align bacteriorhodopsin and HtrII in similar juxtaposition as SRII and HtrII, greatly enhance the signaling. In SRII, the three residues form a chain of hydrogen bonds from the retinal's photoisomerized C(13)=C(14) double bond to residues in the membrane-embedded alpha-helices of HtrII. The results suggest a chemical mechanism for signaling that entails initial storage of energy of photoisomerization in SRII's hydrogen bond between Tyr-174, which is in contact with the retinal, and Thr-204, which borders residues on the SRII surface in contact with HtrII, followed by transfer of this chemical energy to drive structural transitions in the transducer helices. The results demonstrate that evolution accomplished an elegant but simple conversion: The essential differences between transport and signaling proteins in the rhodopsin family are far less than previously imagined.This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Importance of Specific Hydrogen Bonds of Archaeal Rhodopsins for the Binding to the Transducer ProteinJournal of Molecular Biology, 2006
- Effects of Solubilization on the Structure and Function of the Sensory Rhodopsin II/Transducer ComplexJournal of Molecular Biology, 2006
- Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxisBioEssays, 2005
- Steric Constraint in the Primary Photoproduct of an Archaeal Rhodopsin from Regiospecific Perturbation of C−D Stretching Vibration of the Retinyl ChromophoreJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2005
- Five Residues in the HtrI Transducer Membrane-proximal Domain Close the Cytoplasmic Proton-conducting Channel of Sensory Rhodopsin IOnline Journal of Public Health Informatics, 2004
- Structural and Functional Characterization of π Bulges and Other Short Intrahelical DeformationsStructure, 2004
- Proteorhodopsin phototrophy in the oceanNature, 2001
- Structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 1.55 Å resolutionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1999
- THE TWO-COMPONENT SIGNALING PATHWAY OF BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS: A Molecular View of Signal Transduction by Receptors, Kinases, and Adaptation EnzymesAnnual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 1997
- Vibrational spectroscopy of bacteriorhodopsin mutants: light-driven proton transport involves protonation changes of aspartic acid residues 85, 96, and 212Biochemistry, 1988