Secondhand Brokerage: Evidence On The Importance Of Local Structure For Managers, Bankers, And Analysts
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 50 (1), 119-148
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24162082
Abstract
Analyzing network associations with performance in three study populations, I find that secondhand brokerage—moving information between people to whom one is only connected indirectly—often has little or no value. Brokerage benefits are dramatically concentrated in the immediate network around a person. Why that is so, and conditions under which it is more or less so, are examined. The research implication is that brokerage can be measured with designs in which data are limited to an immediate network. The theory implication is that the social capital of brokerage is a local phenomenon mirrored in the Austrian market metaphor's emphasis on tacit, local knowledge.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Importance of Relationship Timing for DiffusionSocial Forces, 2002
- Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal StudyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2000
- Two Views on Social Stability: An Unsettled QuestionAmerican Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1999
- The Categorical Imperative: Securities Analysts and the Illegitimacy DiscountAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1999
- Power and Conflicts of Interest in Professional Firms: Evidence from Investment BankingAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1998
- Horizons of Observability and Limits of Informal Control in OrganizationsSocial Forces, 1983
- Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange NetworksAmerican Sociological Review, 1978
- A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on BetweennessSociometry, 1977
- Positions in NetworksSocial Forces, 1976
- Foundations of Sociometry: An IntroductionSociometry, 1941