Geographical variations in the benefit of applying a prioritization system for cataract surgery in different regions of Spain
Open Access
- 4 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 8 (1), 32
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-32
Abstract
Background In Spain, there are substantial variations in the utilization of health resources among regions. Because the need for surgery differs in patients with appropriate surgical indication, introducing a prioritization system might be beneficial. Our objective was to assess geographical variations in the impact of applying a prioritization system in patients on the waiting list for cataract surgery in different regions of Spain by using a discrete-event simulation model. Methods A discrete-event simulation model to evaluate demand and waiting time for cataract surgery was constructed. The model was reproduced and validated in five regions of Spain and was fed administrative data (population census, surgery rates, waiting list information) and data from research studies (incidence of cataract). The benefit of introducing a prioritization system was contrasted with the usual first-in, first-out (FIFO) discipline. The prioritization system included clinical, functional and social criteria. Priority scores ranged between 0 and 100, with greater values indicating higher priority. The measure of results was the waiting time weighted by the priority score of each patient who had passed through the waiting list. Benefit was calculated as the difference in time weighted by priority score between operating according to waiting time or to priority. Results The mean waiting time for patients undergoing surgery according to the FIFO discipline varied from 1.97 months (95% CI 1.85; 2.09) in the Basque Country to 10.02 months (95% CI 9.91; 10.12) in the Canary Islands. When the prioritization system was applied, the mean waiting time was reduced to a minimum of 0.73 months weighted by priority score (95% CI 0.68; 0.78) in the Basque Country and a maximum of 5.63 months (95% CI 5.57; 5.69) in the Canary Islands. The waiting time weighted by priority score saved by the prioritization system varied from 1.12 months (95% CI 1.07; 1.16) in Andalusia to 2.73 months (95% CI 2.67; 2.80) in Aragon. Conclusion The prioritization system reduced the impact of the variations found among the regions studied, thus improving equity. Prioritization allocates the available resources within each region more efficiently and reduces the waiting time of patients with greater need. Prioritization was more beneficial than allocating surgery by waiting time alone.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time-trend and variations in the proportion of second-eye cataract surgeryBMC Health Services Research, 2007
- Revisión sistemática de estudios poblacionales de prevalencia de catarataArchivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, 2006
- ¿A qué incentivos responde la utilización hospitalaria en el Sistema Nacional de Salud?Gaceta Sanitaria, 2006
- Sobre el uso racional del medicamento desde hace 50 añosGaceta Sanitaria, 2005
- Computer modelling of a cataract waiting listBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001
- Patients' acceptance of waiting for cataract surgery: What makes a wait too long?Social Science & Medicine (1982), 1997
- The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: OverviewBMJ, 1997
- A Decision-Making Aid for Long-Term Care Waiting List Policies: Modelling First-Come, First-Served vs. Needs-Based CriteriaHealthcare Management Forum, 1996
- Assessment of Waiting Time and Priority Setting by Means of a National RegisterInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1996
- Estimating incidence from age‐specific prevalence for irreversible diseases with differential mortalityStatistics in Medicine, 1986