Correcting HIV Prevalence Estimates for Survey Nonparticipation Using Heckman-type Selection Models
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Epidemiology
- Vol. 22 (1), 27-35
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181ffa201
Abstract
Background: HIV prevalence estimates from population-based surveys are vulnerable to selection bias if HIV status is missing for a proportion of the eligible population. Standard approaches, such as imputation, to correct prevalence estimates for selective nonparticipation assume that data are “missing at random.” These approaches lead to biased estimates, if unobserved factors are associated with both survey participation and HIV status. Methods: We use Heckman-type selection models to test and correct for selection on unobserved factors (separately for men and women) in the 2007 Zambia Demographic and Health Survey, in which 28% of the 7146 eligible men and 23% of the 7408 eligible women did not participate in HIV testing. Performance of these models depends crucially on selection variables that determine survey participation but do not independently affect HIV status. Results: We identify 2 highly-plausible selection variables that are statistically significant determinants of survey participation: interviewer identity, and visit on the first day of fieldwork in a survey cluster. HIV-positive status was negatively correlated with consent to test in men (ρ = −0.75 [95% confidence interval = −0.94 to −0.18]), but not in women. Adjusting for selection on unobserved variables substantially increased the HIV prevalence estimate for men from 12% (based on measured HIV status alone) and 12% (based on imputation) to 21%. In addition, the adjustment for selection substantially changed the estimated effects of HIV risk factors. Conclusions: Studies of HIV prevalence and risk factors based on surveys with substantial nonparticipation should routinely use Heckman-type selection models to correct for selection on unobserved variables.This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short Communication: Prioritizing Communities for HIV Prevention in sub-Saharan AfricaAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 2010
- Implications of the HIV testing protocol for refusal bias in seroprevalence surveysBMC Public Health, 2009
- Refusal bias in HIV prevalence estimates from nationally representative seroprevalence surveysAIDS, 2009
- Localized spatial clustering of HIV infections in a widely disseminated rural South African epidemicInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Comparison of adult HIV prevalence from national population-based surveys and antenatal clinic surveillance in countries with generalised epidemics: implications for calibrating surveillance dataSexually Transmitted Infections, 2008
- Evaluation of bias in HIV seroprevalence estimates from national household surveysSexually Transmitted Infections, 2008
- The socioeconomic determinants of HIV incidence: evidence from a longitudinal, population-based study in rural South AfricaAIDS, 2007
- HIV testing in national population-based surveys: experience from the Demographic and Health SurveysBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2006
- National population based HIV prevalence surveys in sub-Saharan Africa: results and implications for HIV and AIDS estimatesSexually Transmitted Infections, 2006
- Choices, beliefs, and infectious disease dynamicsJournal of Health Economics, 2003