Evaluation of biological pathways involved in chemotherapy response in breast cancer
Open Access
- 29 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Breast Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (2), R37
- https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2088
Abstract
Our goal was to examine the association between biological pathways and response to chemotherapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancers separately. Gene set enrichment analysis including 852 predefined gene sets, was applied to gene expression data from 51 ER-negative and 82 ER-positive breast cancers that were all treated with a preoperative paclitaxel, 5-fluoruracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Twenty-seven (53%) ER-negative and 7 (9%) ER-positive patients had pathologic complete response (pCR) to therapy. Among the ER-negative cancers, a proliferation gene signature (FDR q = 0.1), the Genomic Grade Index (FDR q = 0.044) and the E2F3 pathway (FDR q = 0.22, p = 0.07) signature were enriched in the pCR group. Among the ER-positive cancers, the proliferation signature (FDR q = 0.001) and the Genomic Grade Index (FDR q = 0.015) were also significantly enriched in cases with pCR. Ki67 expression, as single gene marker of proliferation, did not provide the same information as the entire proliferation signature. An ER-associated gene set (FDR q = 0.03) and a mutant p53-gene signature (FDR q = 0.0019) were enriched in ER-positive cancers with residual cancer. Proliferation- and genomic grade-related gene signatures are associated with chemotherapy sensitivity in both ER-negative and -positive breast cancers. Genes involved in the E2F3 pathway are associated with chemotherapy sensitivity among ER-negative cancers. The mutant p53-signature and expression of ER-related genes were associated with lower sensitivity to chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancers only.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer: Understanding the Molecular Basis of Histologic Grade To Improve PrognosisJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2006
- Common markers of proliferationNature Reviews Cancer, 2006
- Oncogenic pathway signatures in human cancers as a guide to targeted therapiesNature, 2005
- Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profilesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005
- An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survivalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- Proliferation markers predictive of the pathological response and disease outcome of patients with breast carcinomas treated by anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2004
- Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-valuesBioinformatics, 2003
- International Expert Panel on the Use of Primary (Preoperative) Systemic Treatment of Operable Breast Cancer: Review and RecommendationsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetesNature Genetics, 2003
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery RatesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002