Use of Land Facets to Plan for Climate Change: Conserving the Arenas, Not the Actors
Top Cited Papers
- 14 May 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 24 (3), 701-710
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01422.x
Abstract
Even under the most optimistic scenarios, during the next century human-caused climate change will threaten many wild populations and species. The most useful conservation response is to enlarge and link protected areas to support range shifts by plants and animals. To prioritize land for reserves and linkages, some scientists attempt to chain together four highly uncertain models (emission scenarios, global air–ocean circulation, regional circulation, and biotic response). This approach has high risk of error propagation and compounding and produces outputs at a coarser scale than conservation decisions. Instead, we advocate identifying land facets—recurring landscape units with uniform topographic and soil attributes—and designing reserves and linkages for diversity and interspersion of these units. This coarse-filter approach would conserve the arenas of biological activity, rather than the temporary occupants of those arenas. Integrative, context-sensitive variables, such as insolation and topographic wetness, are useful for defining land facets. Classification procedures such as k-means or fuzzy clustering are a good way to define land facets because they can analyze millions of pixels and are insensitive to case order. In regions lacking useful soil maps, river systems or riparian plants can indicate important facets. Conservation planners should set higher representation targets for rare and distinctive facets. High interspersion of land facets can promote ecological processes, evolutionary interaction, and range shift. Relevant studies suggest land-facet diversity is a good surrogate for today's biodiversity, but fails to conserve some species. To minimize such failures, a reserve design based on land facets should complement, rather than replace, other approaches. Designs based on land facets are not biased toward data-rich areas and can be applied where no maps of land cover exist.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opening the climate envelope reveals no macroscale associations with climate in European birdsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO 2 emissionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South AfricaBiological Conservation, 2003
- Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic RegionBiological Conservation, 2003
- Focal Species, Community Representation, and Physical Proxies as Conservation Strategies: a Case Study in the Amphibolite Mountains, North Carolina, U.S.A.Conservation Biology, 2002
- Strategies to Protect Biological Diversity and the Evolutionary Processes That Sustain ItSystematic Biology, 2002
- From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species‐rich mediterranean‐climate desert of southern AfricaDiversity and Distributions, 1999
- Selecting representative reserve systems in remote areas: A case study in the Nullarbor region, AustraliaBiological Conservation, 1989
- Paleoecology and the Coarse‐Filter Approach to Maintaining Biological DiversityConservation Biology, 1988
- Assessing representativeness of places for conservation reservation and heritage listingEnvironmental Management, 1988