Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia
- 18 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Vol. 2010 (9), CD004457
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004457.pub2
Abstract
Although epidural analgesia provides the most effective labour analgesia, it is associated with some adverse obstetric consequences, including an increased risk of instrumental delivery. Many centres discontinue epidural analgesia late in labour to improve a woman's ability to push and reduce the rate of instrumental delivery. To assess the impact of discontinuing epidural analgesia late in labour on: i) rates of instrumental deliveries and other delivery outcomes; and ii) analgesia and satisfaction with labour care. We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (October 2007). Randomised controlled trials of epidurals discontinued late in labour compared with continuation of the same epidural protocol until birth, in women who receive an epidural for analgesia in the first stage of labour. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality and extracted the data. We analysed categorical data using relative risk (RR), and continuous data using weighted mean difference. We identified six studies, of which five were included (462 participants). Three of these were high‐quality studies whilst the other two were judged to be of lower quality because placebo was not used and the method of randomisation not described. All studies used different epidural analgesia protocols (type of drug, dosage or method of administration). Overall, the reduction in instrumental delivery rate was not statistically significant (23% versus 28%, RR 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 1.15) nor was there any statistically significant difference in rates of other delivery outcomes. The only statistically significant result was an increase in inadequate pain relief when the epidural was stopped (22% versus 6%, RR 3.68, 95% CI 1.99 to 6.80). There is insufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that discontinuing epidural analgesia late in labour reduces the rate of instrumental delivery. There is evidence that it increases the rate of inadequate pain relief in the second stage of labour. The practice of discontinuing epidurals is widespread and the size of the reduction in instrumental delivery rate could be clinically important; therefore, we recommend a larger study than those included in this review be undertaken to determine whether this effect is real or has occurred by chance, and to provide stronger evidence about the safety aspects.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic reviewPublished by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ,2000
- Managing Second-Stage LabourAWHONN Lifelines, 1999
- Faecal incontinence after childbirthBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain — options of 1091 Finnish parturientsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1995
- Continuous Epidural Infusion of 0.0625% Bupivacaine-0.0002% Fentanyl during the Second Stage of LaborAnesthesiology, 1990
- Hospital practice: A survey of the management of the second stage of labour with epidural analgesiaJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Benefits of Continuous Infusion Epidural Analgesia Throughout Vaginal DeliveryActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1988
- The Influence of Continuous Epidural Bupivacaine Analgesia on the Second Stage of Labor and Method of Delivery in Nulliparous WomenAnesthesiology, 1987
- Uterine activity in the second stage of labour and the effect of epidural analgesiaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Second stage of labour with or without extradural analgesiaAnaesthesia, 1983