Contribution of Laparoscopic Training to Robotic Proficiency
- 1 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 27 (8), 1027-1031
- https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0082
Abstract
Purpose: Robotic surgical technology has been adopted by surgeons with and without previous standard laparoscopic experience. The necessity or benefit of prior training and experience in laparoscopic surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that laparoscopic training enhances performance in robotic surgery. Materials and Methods: Fourteen medical students with no surgical experience were instructed to incise a spiral using the da Vinci® surgical robot with time to completion and errors recorded. Each student was then trained for 1 month in standard laparoscopy, but with no further robotic exposure. Training included a validated laparoscopic training program, including timed and scored parameters. After completion of the month-long training, the students repeated the cutting exercise using the da Vinci robot as well as with standard laparoscopic instruments and were scored within the same parameters. Results: The mean time to completely incise the spiral robotically before training was 16.72 min with a mean of 6.21 errors. After 1 month of validated laparoscopic training, the mean robotic time fell to 9:03 min (p=0.0002) with 3.57 errors (p=0.02). Laparoscopic performance after 1 month of validated laparoscopic training was 13.95 min with 6.14 errors, which was no better than pretraining robotic performance (p=0.20) and worse than post-training robotic performance (p=0.01). Conclusions: Formal laparoscopic training improved the performance of a complex robotic task. The initial robotic performance without any robotic or laparoscopic training was equivalent to standard laparoscopic performance after extensive training. Additionally, after laparoscopic training, the robot allowed significantly superior speed and precision of the task. Laparoscopic training may improve the proficiency in operation of the robot. This may explain the perceived ease with which robotics is adopted by laparoscopically trained surgeons and may be important in training future robotic surgeons.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contemporary Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Practice Patterns Among Urologists in the United StatesJournal of Urology, 2012
- Robotic-assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of Outcomes and Evaluation of Learning CurveUrology, 2011
- Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in Abdominal Surgery Compared With That of LaparoscopyAnnals of Surgery, 2010
- FLS and FES: Comprehensive Models of Training and AssessmentSurgical Clinics of North America, 2010
- Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room—a randomized controlled trialThe American Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Robotic SimulatorJournal of Endourology, 2009
- Robotic versus Standard Laparoscopic Partial/Wedge Nephrectomy: A Comparison of Intraoperative and Perioperative Results from a Single InstitutionJournal of Endourology, 2008
- Robotic surgical education: A systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrology, 2006
- Simulator Training for Laparoscopic Suturing Using Performance Goals Translates to the Operating RoomJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005
- Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgerySurgery, 2004