Isometric training and long‐term adaptations: Effects of muscle length, intensity, and intent: A systematic review
- 23 December 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- Vol. 29 (4), 484-503
- https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13375
Abstract
Isometric training is used in the rehabilitation and physical preparation of athletes, special populations and the general public. However, little consensus exists regarding training guidelines for a variety of desired outcomes. Understanding the adaptive response to specific loading parameters would be of benefit to practitioners. The objective of this systematic review, therefore, was to detail the medium to long‐term adaptations of different types of isometric training on morphological, neurological and performance variables. Exploration of the relevant subject matter was performed through MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases. English, full‐text, peer‐reviewed journal articles and unpublished doctoral dissertations investigating medium to long‐term (≥3 weeks) adaptations to isometric training in humans were identified. These studies were evaluated further for methodological quality. Twenty‐three research outputs were reviewed. Isometric training at longer muscle lengths (0.86‐1.69%/week, ES = 0.03‐0.09/week) produced greater muscular hypertrophy when compared to equal volumes of shorter muscle length training (0.08‐0.83%/week, ES = ‐0.003‐0.07/week). Ballistic intent resulted in greater neuromuscular activation (1.04‐10.5%/week, ES = 0.02‐0.31/week vs. 1.64‐5.53%/week, ES = 0.03‐0.20/week) and rapid force production (1.2‐13.4%/week, ES = 0.05‐0.61/week vs. 1.01‐8.13%/week, ES = 0.06‐0.22/week). Substantial improvements in muscular hypertrophy and maximal force production were reported regardless of training intensity. High‐intensity (≥ 70%) contractions are required for improving tendon structure and function. Additionally, long muscle length training results in greater transference to dynamic performance. Despite relatively few studies meeting the inclusion criteria, this review provides practitioners with insight into which isometric training variables (e.g. joint angle, intensity, intent) to manipulate to achieve desired morphological and neuromuscular adaptations.Keywords
This publication has 103 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corticomotor plasticity following unilateral strength trainingMuscle & Nerve, 2012
- Resistance Training vs. Static Stretching: Effects on Flexibility and StrengthJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2011
- Muscle activity and time to task failure differ with load compliance and target force for elbow flexor musclesJournal of Applied Physiology, 2011
- Plasticity of human Achilles tendon mechanical and morphological properties in response to cyclic strainJournal of Biomechanics, 2010
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2009
- Understanding Change of Direction Ability in SportSports Medicine, 2008
- Hiking physiology and the “quasi-isometric” conceptJournal of Sports Sciences, 2007
- Expression of collagen and related growth factors in rat tendon and skeletal muscle in response to specific contraction typesJournal Of Physiology-London, 2007
- Angle-specific impairment of elbow flexors strength after isometric exercise at long muscle lengthJournal of Sports Sciences, 2003
- The Use of Isometric Tests of Muscular Function in Athletic AssessmentSports Medicine, 1996