Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: A meta-analysis
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Thrombosis Research
- Vol. 125 (4), e123-e127
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2009.11.009
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Emergency Physicians Use Serum d-Dimer Effectively to Determine the Need for CT When Evaluating Patients for Pulmonary Embolism? Review of 5,344 Consecutive PatientsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2009
- Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography vs Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scanning in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2007
- Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells’ simplified decision ruleThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007
- The Bedside Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis StudyArchives of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed TomographyJAMA, 2006
- Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic DiseaseSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2004
- Clinical Validity of a Normal Pulmonary Angiogram in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism—A Critical ReviewClinical Radiology, 2001
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2000
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- ANTICOAGULANT DRUGS IN THE TREATMENT OF PULMONARY EMBOLISMThe Lancet, 1960