Public Perceptions of Climate Change as a Human Health Risk: Surveys of the United States, Canada and Malta
Open Access
- 14 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 7 (6), 2559-2606
- https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7062559
Abstract
We used data from nationally representative surveys conducted in the United States, Canada and Malta between 2008 and 2009 to answer three questions: Does the public believe that climate change poses human health risks, and if so, are they seen as current or future risks? Whose health does the public think will be harmed? In what specific ways does the public believe climate change will harm human health? When asked directly about the potential impacts of climate change on health and well-being, a majority of people in all three nations said that it poses significant risks; moreover, about one third of Americans, one half of Canadians, and two-thirds of Maltese said that people are already being harmed. About a third or more of people in the United States and Canada saw themselves (United States, 32%; Canada, 67%), their family (United States, 35%; Canada, 46%), and people in their community (United States, 39%; Canada, 76%) as being vulnerable to at least moderate harm from climate change. About one third of Maltese (31%) said they were most concerned about the risk to themselves and their families. Many Canadians said that the elderly (45%) and children (33%) are at heightened risk of harm, while Americans were more likely to see people in developing countries as being at risk than people in their own nation. When prompted, large numbers of Canadians and Maltese said that climate change can cause respiratory problems (78–91%), heat-related problems (75–84%), cancer (61–90%), and infectious diseases (49–62%). Canadians also named sunburn (79%) and injuries from extreme weather events (73%), and Maltese cited allergies (84%). However, climate change appears to lack salience as a health issue in all three countries: relatively few people answered open-ended questions in a manner that indicated clear top-of-mind associations between climate change and human health risks. We recommend mounting public health communication initiatives that increase the salience of the human health consequences associated with climate change.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reframing climate change as a public health issue: an exploratory study of public reactionsBMC Public Health, 2010
- Science, media and public perception: implications for climate and health policiesBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2010
- We Speak for the Trees: Media Reporting on the EnvironmentAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2009
- Climate volatility deepens poverty vulnerability in developing countriesEnvironmental Research Letters, 2009
- Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public EngagementEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2009
- Climate Change and Local Public Health in the United States: Preparedness, Programs and Perceptions of Local Public Health Department DirectorsPLOS ONE, 2008
- An Approach for Assessing Human Health Vulnerability and Public Health Interventions to Adapt to Climate ChangeEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 2006
- Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and ValuesClimatic Change, 2006
- The Origins and Consequences of democratic citizens' Policy Agendas: A Study of Popular Concern about Global WarmingClimatic Change, 2006
- The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998