Workers' Compensation Claims for Needlestick Injuries Among Healthcare Workers in Washington State, 1996-2000
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 26 (9), 775-781
- https://doi.org/10.1086/502616
Abstract
Objectives: : To characterize accepted workers' compensation claims for needlestick injuries filed by healthcare workers (HCWs) in non-hospital compared with hospital settings in Washington State.Design: : Descriptive study of all accepted workers' compensation claims filed between 1996 and 2000 for needlestick injuries.Participants: : All Washington State HCWs eligible to file a state fund workers' compensation claim and those who filed a workers' compensation claim for a needlestick injury.Results: : There were 3,303 accepted state fund HCW needlestick injury claims. The incidence of needlestick injury claims per 10,000 full-time-equivalent HCWs in hospitals was 158.6; in dental offices, 104.7; in physicians' offices, 87.0; and in skilled nursing facilities, 80.8. The most common mechanisms of needlestick injury by work location were as follows: for hospitals, suturing and other surgical procedures (16.7%), administering an injection (12.7%), and drawing blood (10%); for dentists' offices, recapping (21.3%) and cleaning trays and instruments (18.2%); for physicians' offices, disposal (22.2%) and administering an injection (10.2%); and for skilled nursing facilities, disposal (23.7%) and administering an injection (14.9%). Nurses accounted for the largest (29%) proportion of HCWs involved, followed by dental assistants (17%) and laboratory technicians and phlebotomists (12%) in non-hospital settings. Rates of needlestick injury claims increased for non-hospital settings by 7.5% annually (95% confidence interval [CI95], 4.89% to 10.22%; P < .0001). Rates decreased for hospital settings by 5.8% annually, but the decline was not statistically significant (CI95, -12.50% to 1.34%; P < .1088). HCWs were exposed to hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and human immunodeficiency viruses in non-hospital settings.Conclusion: : There was a difference in the incidence rate and mechanisms of needlestick injuries on review of workers' compensation claim records for HCWs in non-hospital and hospital settings.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Injuries and Illnesses From Wood Framing in Residential Construction, Washington State, 1993–1999Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2003
- Sharps-Related Injuries in California Healthcare Facilities: Pilot Study Results From the Sharps Injury Surveillance RegistryInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2003
- The Nature and Frequency of Blood Contacts Among Home Healthcare WorkersInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2000
- Claims incidence of work-related disorders of the upper extremities: Washington state, 1987 through 1995.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Occupational skin diseases in Washington State, 1989 through 1993: using workers' compensation data to identify cutaneous hazards.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- Occupationally acquired HIV: the vulnerability of health care workers under workers' compensation laws.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- Needlesticks: preaching to the seroconverted?The Lancet, 1992
- Needlestick injuries and needle disposal in Minnesota physicians' officesThe American Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Rates of Needle-Stick Injury Caused by Various Devices in a University HospitalThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospitalAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1983