Bonding of enamel‐dentin crown fragments after crown fracture. An experimental study using bonding agents

Abstract

Previous experimental studies into the use of dentin bonding agents for reattachment of enamel-dentin crown fragments have demonstrated fracture strength about 50-60% of that of intact teeth. In the clinic this has been reflected in the frequent need of repeated bonding of the treated incisors due to refracture. Recently newer bonding agents have been developed which can bond equally well with enamel and dentin. Employing the same experimental model, these bonding agents (All-Bond 2, Scotchbond MP) were used to reattach crown fragments to the remaining portion of sheep incisors. Loading of teeth bonded with these agents in an Instron testing machine at a speed of 1 mm/min demonstrated similar fracture strengths as those previously achieved with Gluma, Scotchbond 2 or Tenure. A second study was carried out whereby fragments were bonded with Scotchbond MP and loaded at various speeds. The results demonstrated that the fracture strength decreased exponentially with increased loading speed. By extrapolation, it was concluded that the strength was nil at a loading speed of approximately 2 m/min. It was concluded that the weak link in the bond between tooth fragment and remaining tooth structure is the bonding resin. Theoretically, a resin which is slightly elastic might act as a shock absorber to withstand functional stress. However, studies carried out with resins of varying moduli of elasticity gave disappointing results probably due to their low flexural strength.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)