Testing Protein Leverage in Lean Humans: A Randomised Controlled Experimental Study
Open Access
- 12 October 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (10), e25929
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025929
Abstract
A significant contributor to the rising rates of human obesity is an increase in energy intake. The ‘protein leverage hypothesis’ proposes that a dominant appetite for protein in conjunction with a decline in the ratio of protein to fat and carbohydrate in the diet drives excess energy intake and could therefore promote the development of obesity. Our aim was to test the ‘protein leverage hypothesis’ in lean humans by disguising the macronutrient composition of foods offered to subjects under ad libitum feeding conditions. Energy intakes and hunger ratings were measured for 22 lean subjects studied over three 4-day periods of in-house dietary manipulation. Subjects were restricted to fixed menus in random order comprising 28 foods designed to be similar in palatability, availability, variety and sensory quality and providing 10%, 15% or 25% energy as protein. Nutrient and energy intake was calculated as the product of the amount of each food eaten and its composition. Lowering the percent protein of the diet from 15% to 10% resulted in higher (+12±4.5%, p = 0.02) total energy intake, predominantly from savoury-flavoured foods available between meals. This increased energy intake was not sufficient to maintain protein intake constant, indicating that protein leverage is incomplete. Urinary urea on the 10% and 15% protein diets did not differ statistically, nor did they differ from habitual values prior to the study. In contrast, increasing protein from 15% to 25% did not alter energy intake. On the fourth day of the trial, however, there was a greater increase in the hunger score between 1–2 h after the 10% protein breakfast versus the 25% protein breakfast (1.6±0.4 vs 25%: 0.5±0.3, p = 0.005). In our study population a change in the nutritional environment that dilutes dietary protein with carbohydrate and fat promotes overconsumption, enhancing the risk for potential weight gain.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweightThe Lancet, 2011
- Diets with High or Low Protein Content and Glycemic Index for Weight-Loss MaintenanceThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- The price of protein: combining evolutionary and economic analysis to understand excessive energy consumptionObesity Reviews, 2010
- Design and testing of foods differing in protein to energy ratiosAppetite, 2010
- Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United StatesThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010
- Nutritional goals of wild primatesFunctional Ecology, 2009
- Lifespan and reproduction in Drosophila : New insights from nutritional geometryProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Mechanisms of Food Intake Repression in Indispensable Amino Acid DeficiencyAnnual Review of Nutrition, 2007
- Integrative models of nutrient balancing: application to insects and vertebratesNutrition Research Reviews, 1997
- Growth and food intake responses to diets of different protein contents and a choice between diets containing two concentrations of protein in broiler and layer strains of chickenBritish Poultry Science, 1993