Passive vs. closed suction drainage after perineal wound closure following abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 38 (9), 926-932
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02049727
Abstract
Because evacuation of effusion or collection could depend on the type of drainage, we compared the effects of closed suction drainage with passive drainage through tubes or undulated drains after abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma on early and late perineal wound healing. Of 234 consecutive patients undergoing abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma between January 1983 and August 1990, unsatisfactory hemostasis or gross intraoperative septic contamination were recorded in 48 patients who were not included in the trial. After rectal excision and closure of the perineum, the remaining 186 patients were randomized to receive passive drainage (PD; n = 96) or closed suction drainage (SD; n = 90). Eighteen patients were withdrawn because of protocol violation, and three were lost to follow-up, leaving 165 (89 PD and 76 SD) patients for analysis. Preoperative factors (sex, age, degree of obesity, weight loss, anemia, or presence of ascites), intraoperative and pathologic findings (Dukes stage), and postoperative courses (recurrence, late mortality) were similar in both groups. All patients were followed up for 12 months or until death. The rate of perineums healed at one month was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in PD (55/89 = 61 percent) compared with SD (54/72 = 75 percent) patients. At three months, the rate of healed perineums no longer differed between the two groups (70/87 = 81 percent vs. 60/72 = 84 percent). The number of vaginal fistulas, secondary reopenings, and perineums not healed at 12 months was similar in both groups. Median duration to complete healing was similar in both groups (23 vs. 21 days, respectively). On the other hand, three retained drains were seen in PD patients only. The median duration of hospital stay was identical in both groups (22 days). Seven patients died in the early postoperative period, including one in the PD group and six in the SD group. There was no significant difference in the number of late deaths (3 vs. 7) in PD and SD patients, respectively. These results suggest that closed suction drainage should be used after abdominoperineal rectal excision with satisfactory hemostasis or absence of gross introperative septic contamination.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perineal wound management after abdominoperineal rectal excision for carcinoma with unsatisfactory hemostasis or gross septic contamination: Primary closure vs. packingDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1994
- Management of the perineal wound following abdominoperineal resection: prospective study of three methodsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- Effective Surgical Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Rectal CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Clinical comparison of perineal wound managementDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1980
- Healing of the Perineal WoundArchives of Surgery, 1980
- Perineal wound healing after proctectomy for carcinoma and inflammatory diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Management of the perineal wound after rectal excision for neoplastic diseaseDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1979
- A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Primary closure and healing of the perineal wound in abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgery, 1974
- Management of the pelvic space after proctectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974