Rethinking the Baseline in Diversity Research
Open Access
- 6 May 2014
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Vol. 9 (3), 235-244
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614527466
Abstract
It is often surprisingly difficult to make definitive scientific statements about the functional value of group diversity. We suggest that one clear pattern in the group diversity literature is the prevailing convention of interpreting outcomes as the effect of diversity alone. Although work in this arena typically compares diverse groups with homogeneous ones, we most often conceive of homogeneous groups as a baseline—a reference point from which we can understand how diversity has changed behavior or what type of response is “normal.” In this article, we offer a new perspective through a focus on two propositions. The first proposition is that homogeneity has independent effects of its own—effects that, in some cases, are robust in comparison with the effects of diversity. The second proposition is that even though subjective responses in homogeneous groups are often treated as a neutral indicator of how people would ideally respond in a group setting, evidence suggests that these responses are often less objective or accurate than responses in diverse groups. Overall, we believe that diversity research may unwittingly reveal important insights regarding the effects of homogeneity.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Living with an other-race roommate shapes Whites' behavior in subsequent diverse settingsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2013
- The “Out of Africa” Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic DevelopmentAmerican Economic Review, 2013
- “In‐Group Love” and “Out‐Group Hate” in Repeated Interaction Between GroupsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2011
- Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Management, 2010
- An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities, and SegregationEconometrica, 2009
- “In-Group Love” and “Out-Group Hate” as Motives for Individual Participation in Intergroup ConflictPsychological Science, 2008
- A Model of the Ingroup as a Social ResourcePersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2005
- The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?Journal of Social Issues, 1999
- Nationalism, Patriotism, and AggressionPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1994
- In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1979