When Objectivity is Not Objective: Network Television News Coverage of U.S. Senators and the "Paradox of Objectivity"
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Politics
- Vol. 54 (3), 810-833
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2132313
Abstract
Do the electronic media, the principal source of political information for many if not most American citizens, present biased accounts of national affairs? Our analyses of network coverage of U.S. senators during the 1970s and 1980s find that the networks follow objective routines, which normally ensure balanced reporting of political affairs. During times of seismic change in the political landscape, however, these very routines can produce what might be interpreted as biased coverage. The first four years of the Reagan administration, we show, is a striking example of this phenomenon. We label this the "paradox of objectivity," a phenomenon that greatly complicates the evaluation of news reporting.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHO GETS NATIONAL NEWS COVERAGE IN THE U.S. SENATE?American Politics Quarterly, 1988
- Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical EssayAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1985
- Covering CongressPolity, 1985
- The Media, the War in Vietnam, and Political Support: A Critique of the Thesis of an Oppositional MediaThe Journal of Politics, 1984
- Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-So-Minimal” Consequences of Television News ProgramsAmerican Political Science Review, 1982
- Liberalism & National Newspaper Coverage of Members of CongressPolity, 1981
- Type-Set Politics: Impact of Newspapers on Public ConfidenceAmerican Political Science Review, 1979
- Television interview shows: The politics of visibilityJournal of Broadcasting, 1977
- Positive Support for Political Institutions: The Case of CongressThe Western Political Quarterly, 1972
- The Use of Variance Components Models in Pooling Cross Section and Time Series DataEconometrica, 1971