Potential Efficiency Benefits of Nonmydriatic Ultrawide Field Retinal Imaging in an Ocular Telehealth Diabetic Retinopathy Program
Open Access
- 11 December 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 37 (1), 50-55
- https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1292
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare efficiency of nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging (UWFI) and nonmydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) in a diabetic retinopathy (DR) ocular telehealth program. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients in this retrospective, comparative cohort study underwent NMFP and UWFI between 1 November 2011 and 1 November 2012. Images were evaluated for DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) by certified graders using a standard protocol at a centralized reading center. Identification of DR, image evaluation time, and rate of ungradable eyes were compared. RESULTS NMFP and UWFI were performed in 1,633 and 2,170 consecutive patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding age, diabetes duration, sex, ethnicity, or insulin use. The ungradable rate per patient for DR (2.9 vs. 9.9%, P < 0.0001) and DME (3.8 vs. 8.8%, P < 0.0001) was lower with UWFI than with NMFP. With UWFI, the median image evaluation time per patient was reduced from 12.8 to 9.2 min (P < 0.0001). The identification of patients with DR (38.4 vs. 33.8%) and vision-threatening DR (14.5 vs. 11.9%) was increased with UWFI versus NMFP. In a consecutive subgroup of 502 eyes of 301 patients with DR, the distribution of peripheral retinal lesions outside Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study fields suggested a more severe DR level in 9.0% (45 eyes). CONCLUSIONS In a standardized DR ocular telehealth program, nonmydriatic UWFI reduced the ungradable rate by 71% (to <3%) and reduced image evaluation time by 28%. DR was identified 17% more frequently after UWFI, and DR peripheral lesions suggested a more severe DR level in 9%. These data suggest that UWFI may improve efficiency of ocular telehealth programs evaluating DR and DME.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Nonmydriatic Ultra-Widefield Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (Optomap) Compared With ETDRS 7-Field Stereo PhotographyDiabetes Care, 2012
- Comparison of Low-Light Nonmydriatic Digital Imaging with 35-mm ETDRS Seven-Standard Field Stereo Color Fundus Photographs and Clinical ExaminationTelemedicine and e-Health, 2012
- Nonmydriatic Ultrawide Field Retinal Imaging Compared With Dilated Standard 7-Field 35-mm Photography and Retinal Specialist Examination for Evaluation of Diabetic RetinopathyAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012
- Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy, Second EditionTelemedicine and e-Health, 2011
- Ocular Telemedicine for Diabetic Retinopathy and the Joslin Vision NetworkSeminars in Ophthalmology, 2010
- Ocular telehealth initiatives in diabetic retinopathy.Current Diabetes Reports, 2009
- The Sensitivity and Specificity of Nonmydriatic Digital Stereoscopic Retinal Imaging in Detecting Diabetic RetinopathyDiabetes Care, 2006
- Comparison of Nonmydriatic Digital Retinal Imaging versus Dilated Ophthalmic Examination for Nondiabetic Eye Disease in Persons with DiabetesOphthalmology, 2006
- USE OF JOSLIN VISION NETWORK DIGITAL-VIDEO NONMYDRIATIC RETINAL IMAGING TO ASSESS DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN A CLINICAL PROGRAMRetina, 2003
- Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathyOphthalmology, 2001