Identifying Depressive Subtypes in a Large Cohort Study
- 13 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc in British Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 71 (12), 1582-1589
- https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.09m05398blu
Abstract
Objective: The heterogeneity of depression in the current classification system remains a point of discussion in the psychiatric field, despite previous efforts to subclassify depressive disorders. Data-driven techniques may help to come to a more empirically based classification. This study aimed to identify depressive subtypes within a large cohort of subjects with depression. Method: Baseline data from 818 persons with a DSM-IV diagnosis of current major depressive disorder or minor depression who participated in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety were used. Respondents were recruited in the community, in primary care, and in specialized mental health care from September 2004 through February 2007. Latent classes were derived from latent class analysis using 16 depressive symptoms from the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. Classes were characterized using demographic, clinical psychiatric, psychosocial, and physical health descriptors. Results: Three classes were identified: a severe melancholic class (prevalence, 46.3%), a severe atypical class (prevalence, 24.6%), and a class of moderate severity (prevalence, 29.1%). Both severe classes were characterized by more neuroticism (melancholic OR=1.05 [95% CI, 1.01-1.10]; atypical OR=1.07 [95% Cl, 1.03-1.12]), more disability (melancholic OR=1.07 [95% Cl, 1.05-1.09]; atypical OR=1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.07]), and less extraversion (melancholic OR=0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]; atypical OR=0.95 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99] than the moderate class. Comparing the melancholic class with the atypical class revealed that the melancholic class had more smokers (atypical OR=0.57 [95% CI, 0.39-0.84]) and more childhood trauma (atypical OR=0.86 [95% CI, 0.74-1.00]), whereas the atypical class had more women (atypical OR=1.52 [95% CI, 0.99-2.32]), a higher body mass index (atypical OR=1.13 [95% CI, 1.09-1.17]), and more metabolic syndrome (atypical OR=2.17 [95% CI, 1.38-3.42]). Conclusions: Both depression severity (moderate vs severe) and the nature of depressive symptoms (melancholic vs atypical) were found to be important differentiators between subtypes. Higher endorsement rates of somatic symptoms and more metabolic syndrome in the atypical class suggest the involvement of a metabolic component. J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71(12):1582-1589 (C) Copyright 2010 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Depression and Type 2 Diabetes Over the LifespanDiabetes Care, 2008
- Classification of depressive disorders in the DSM-V: Proposal for a two-dimension system.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2008
- Kraepelin, biological psychiatry, and beyondArchiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten, 2008
- Classification of Mood Disorders in DSM-V and DSM-VIAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2008
- The leptin hypothesis of depression: a potential link between mood disorders and obesity?Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 2007
- Differential Association of Cognitive and Somatic Depressive Symptoms With Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease: Findings From the Heart and Soul StudyPsychosomatic Medicine, 2007
- Atypical depression, somatic depression and anxious depression in women: Are they gender-preferred phenotypes?Journal of Affective Disorders, 2007
- Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the pathogenesis of depressionTrends in Immunology, 2006
- Depressive disorders—is it time to endorse different pathophysiologies?Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2006
- Atypical depressive syndromes in varying definitionsArchiv Fur Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten, 2005