The inclusion of bias in reflective and reflexive research
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Research in Nursing
- Vol. 10 (3), 279-295
- https://doi.org/10.1177/174498710501000305
Abstract
In this paper I explore the relationship between bias, research and reflective studies. I argue that bias is not by definition counterproductive for research studies, and that biased studies do not necessarily constitute invalid research. Hence, I commence by discussing how the concept of bias and its relationship to knowledge production has developed within the history of science and how it has evolved during the twentieth century by drawing on the work of Ayer, Popper and Wittgenstein. I go on to argue that bias cannot sincerely be excluded from the research process, irrelevant of paradigm, and that the presupposition of excluding bias from research studies is based upon historical and ideological assumptions that, once pushed to their logical conclusion, do not hold ground. Nonetheless, I consider that research studies deriving from positivist or post-positivist paradigms will need to continue to strive for the elimination or minimisation of bias, because these are the fundamental rules of these paradigms. However, for non-positivist studies, which utilise reflection to reveal the researcher’s bias, the paradigmatic rules require that these biases should be included rather than excluded from the study. Thus, the article concludes by suggesting that such studies are reflexive studies which are valid only if the researcher’s bias is fully incorporated and becomes transparent throughout the study.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reflective practice and daily ward reality: a covert power gameJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2004
- Issues of Representation within Qualitative InquiryQualitative Health Research, 2004
- Misleading Evidence and Evidence-Led Policy: Making Social Science more ExperimentalThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2003
- Effect of interpretive bias on research evidenceBMJ, 2003
- The mentor’s tale: a reflexive account of semi-structured interviewsNurse Researcher, 2003
- Theory and Research on Stereotypes and Perceptual BiasThe Counseling Psychologist, 2001
- Interaction and understanding: ‘me’ in the researchNurse Researcher, 2000
- Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative researchBMJ, 2000
- Error, bias and validity in qualitative researchEducational Action Research, 1997
- Postmodernism and ActionOrganization, 1996