Hybrid PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung nodules—a literature review
- 27 July 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Vol. 48 (2), 584-591
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04955-z
Abstract
Background The use of hybrid PET/MRI for clinical staging is growing in several cancer forms and, consequently, PET/MRI has also gained interest in the assessment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung lesions. However, lung evaluation with PET/MRI is associated with challenges related to technical issues and diagnostic image quality. We, therefore, investigated the published literature on PET/MRI for clinical staging in NSCLC or lung nodule detection specifically addressing diagnostic accuracy and technical issues. Methods The data originates from a systematic search performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library on hybrid PET/MRI in patients with cancer for a scoping review published earlier (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04402-8). Studies in English and German evaluating the diagnostic performance of hybrid PET/MRI for NSCLC or lung nodule detection in cancer patients were selected. Data reported in peer-reviewed journals without restrictions to year of publication were included. Results A total of 3138 publications were identified from which 116 published 2012–2018 were included. Of these, nine studies addressed PET/MRI in NSCLC (4) or lung nodule detection (5). Overall, PET/MRI did not provide advantages in preoperative T- and N-staging in NSCLC compared to PET/CT. The data on M-staging were too few for conclusions to be drawn. The lung nodule detection rate of PET/MRI was comparable to that of PET/CT for FDG-avid nodules larger than 10 mm, but the sensitivity of PET/MRI for detection of non-FDG-avid nodules smaller than 5 mm was low. Conclusion PET/MRI did not provide advantages in T- and N-staging of NSCLC compared to PET/CT. PET/MRI had a comparable sensitivity for detection of FDG-avid lung nodules and nodules over 10 mm, but PET/CT yielded a higher detection rate in non FDG-avid lung nodules under 5 mm. With PET/MRI, the overall detection rate for lung nodules in various cancer types remains inferior to that of PET/CT due to the lower diagnostic performance of MRI than CT in the lungs.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Thoracic Staging in Lung Cancer: Prospective Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MR Imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CTJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2014
- Clinical Impact of PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Cancer Undergoing Same-Day PET/CT: Initial Experience in 134 Patients—A Hypothesis-generating Exploratory StudyRadiology, 2013
- Pulmonary Nodules in Patients with Primary Malignancy: Comparison of Hybrid PET/MR and PET/CT ImagingRadiology, 2013
- MRI of the lung (1/3): methodsInsights into Imaging, 2012
- Detection and size of pulmonary lesions: how accurate is MRI? A prospective comparison of CT and MRIActa Radiologica, 2012
- MRI of the lung (2/3). Why … when … how?Insights into Imaging, 2012
- Retrospective data-driven respiratory gating for PET/CTPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 2009
- MRI of pulmonary nodules: technique and diagnostic valueCancer Imaging, 2008
- Evaluation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scanning for pulmonary nodules less than 3 cm in diameter, with special reference to the CT imagesLung Cancer, 2004
- Small Pulmonary Nodules: Detection at Chest CT and OutcomeRadiology, 2003