Multistate improvement in process and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 39 (2), 372-380
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.023
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- To What Extent Should Quality of Care Decisions Be Based on Health Outcomes Data?Stroke, 2002
- Surgeon Volume as an Indicator of Outcomes After Carotid EndarterectomyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- REVIEW ARTICLE: Is there a Positive Volume–Outcome Relationship in Peripheral Vascular Surgery? Results of a Systematic ReviewEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2000
- REVIEW ARTICLE: Is there a Positive Volume–Outcome Relationship in Peripheral Vascular Surgery? Results of a Systematic ReviewEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2000
- Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Carotid Endarterectomy Among Medicare BeneficiariesStroke, 1998
- A Regional Intervention to Improve the Hospital Mortality Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryJAMA, 1996
- Surgical results: A justification of the surgeon selection process for the ACAS trialJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1996
- Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991