Magnetic resonance imaging safety in nonconditional pacemaker and defibrillator recipients: A meta-analysis and systematic review
- 17 February 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Heart Rhythm
- Vol. 15 (7), 1001-1008
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.02.019
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety, feasibility, and diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverters/defibrillators at 1.5 TAmerican Heart Journal, 2011
- MRI-Guided Ventricular Tachycardia AblationCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2011
- Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker‐attached leads at 1.5 tesla MRIJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2011
- Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of “MR Conditional” designsJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2011
- The safety of MRI scanning of pacemakers and ICDs: what are the critical elements of safe scanning? Ask me again at 10 000.EP Europace, 2010
- Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environmentHeart Rhythm, 2008
- Clinical Utility and Safety of a Protocol for Noncardiac and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillators at 1.5 TeslaCirculation, 2006
- Food and Drug Administration PerspectiveCirculation, 2006
- Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging?EP Europace, 2005
- Pacemaker Reed Switch Behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Units: Are Reed Switches Always Closed in Strong Magnetic Fields?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2002