Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in British Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 72 (4), 619-643
- https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19940064
Abstract
Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records - Volume 72 Issue 4 - S. A. Bingham, C. Gill, A. Welch, K. Day, A. Cassidy, K. T. Khaw, M. J. Sneyd, T. J. A. Key, L. Roe, N. E. DayThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dietary assessment methods evaluated in the Malmö food studyJournal of Internal Medicine, 1993
- Invited Commentary: Some Limitations of Semiquantitative Food Frequency QuestionnairesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Reproducibility and Validity of an Expanded Self-Administered Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire among Male Health ProfessionalsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Non‐starch polysaccharide intake of a representative sample of British adultsJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1990
- Assessment of nutritional intake using dietary records with estimated weightsJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1989
- Comparison of a Food Frequency Questionnaire with a Diet RecordInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF A SEMIQUANTITATIVE FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIREAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- The diet of individuals: a study of a randomly-chosen cross section of British adults in a Cambridgeshire villageBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1981
- Statistical Aspects of Dietary SurveysProceedings of the Nutrition Society, 1954