Experimental evidence for improved neuroimaging interpretation using three‐dimensional graphic models
- 20 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anatomical Sciences Education
- Vol. 5 (3), 132-137
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1275
Abstract
Three‐dimensional (3D) or volumetric visualization is a useful resource for learning about the anatomy of the human brain. However, the effectiveness of 3D spatial visualization has not yet been assessed systematically. This report analyzes whether 3D volumetric visualization helps learners to identify and locate subcortical structures more precisely than classical cross‐sectional images based on a two dimensional (2D) approach. Eighty participants were assigned to each experimental condition: 2D cross‐sectional visualization vs. 3D volumetric visualization. Both groups were matched for age, gender, visual‐spatial ability, and previous knowledge of neuroanatomy. Accuracy in identifying brain structures, execution time, and level of confidence in the response were taken as outcome measures. Moreover, interactive effects between the experimental conditions (2D vs. 3D) and factors such as level of competence (novice vs. expert), image modality (morphological and functional), and difficulty of the structures were analyzed. The percentage of correct answers (hit rate) and level of confidence in responses were significantly higher in the 3D visualization condition than in the 2D. In addition, the response time was significantly lower for the 3D visualization condition in comparison with the 2D. The interaction between the experimental condition (2D vs. 3D) and difficulty was significant, and the 3D condition facilitated the location of difficult images more than the 2D condition. 3D volumetric visualization helps to identify brain structures such as the hippocampus and amygdala, more accurately and rapidly than conventional 2D visualization. This paper discusses the implications of these results with regards to the learning process involved in neuroimaging interpretation. Anat Sci Educ. © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Item difficulty in the evaluation of computer-based instruction: An example from neuroanatomyAnatomical Sciences Education, 2012
- Computer-based learning of neuroanatomy: A longitudinal study of learning, transfer, and retention.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011
- Spatial abilities of expert clinical anatomists: Comparison of abilities between novices, intermediates, and experts in anatomyAnatomical Sciences Education, 2011
- A novel three‐dimensional tool for teaching human neuroanatomyAnatomical Sciences Education, 2010
- Clinical neuroscience attachments: a student’s view of ‘neurophobia’The Clinical Teacher, 2010
- Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blowAnatomical Sciences Education, 2009
- Interpreting three-dimensional structures from two-dimensional images: a web-based interactive 3D teaching model of surgical liver anatomyHPB, 2009
- A usability study of users' perceptions toward a multimedia computer‐assisted learning tool for neuroanatomyAnatomical Sciences Education, 2008
- Neuroimaging in psychiatry: an updateJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2006
- How medical students learn spatial anatomyThe Lancet, 2001