Measuring clinical practice
- 26 February 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Vol. 27 (2), 113-125
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00481.x
Abstract
The goals of this paper are to review techniques for measuring clinical practice within healthcare professions and to discuss possible applications of these techniques to primary care optometry. A review of the literature suggests a lack of systematic research investigating standards of clinical practice within optometry. It is argued that evidence-based research to determine the content of typical optometric eye examinations would be valuable for several reasons: to evaluate the service provided to the public by the profession; setting priorities and assessing the outcomes of continuous education and training; to influence governmental and professional policy decisions; National Health Service General Ophthalmic Services issues; the equitable management of clinicolegal matters and consumer complaints; setting appropriate professional guidelines and developing undergraduate training. Evidence-based studies within other healthcare professions have evaluated the content of clinical consultations. The literature reviewed reveals three main approaches: (1) abstraction of medical records, (2) use of clinical vignettes and (3) use of standardized patients (SPs) who present unannounced to clinics. In this review, we compare and contrast the use of these different methods in assessing the content of clinical consultations. It is clear from the literature reviewed that the use of SPs is the 'gold standard' methodology. Clinical vignettes can also provide useful data, especially if computerized.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- The ethical problem of false positives: a prospective evaluation of physician reporting in the medical recordJournal of Medical Ethics, 2002
- Practices and Attitudes of Japanese Oncologists and Palliative Care Physicians Concerning Terminal Sedation: A Nationwide SurveyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Developing Case-specific Checklists for Standardized-patient—Based Assessments in Internal MedicineAcademic Medicine, 2000
- Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: how valid are the findings?Journal of Clinical Nursing, 1996
- Chart Reviews In Emergency Medicine Research: Where Are The Methods?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Variability in scoring the Hachinski Ischaemic ScoreAge and Ageing, 1995
- Competency assessment of primary care physicians as part of a peer review programPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- The effect of educational preparation on physician performance with a sexually transmitted disease-simulated patientArchives of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Does competence of general practitioners predict their performance? Comparison between examination setting and actual practice.BMJ, 1991
- The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performanceAcademic Medicine, 1990