Development and Validation of a Psychiatric Case-Mix System
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medical Care
- Vol. 44 (6), 568-580
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000215819.76050.a1
Abstract
Although difficulties in applying risk-adjustment measures to mental health populations are increasingly evident, a model designed specifically for patients with psychiatric disorders has never been developed. Our objective was to develop and validate a case-mix classification system, the "PsyCMS," for predicting concurrent and future mental health (MH) and substance abuse (SA) healthcare costs and utilization. Subjects included 914,225 veterans who used Veterans Administration (VA) healthcare services during fiscal year 1999 (FY99) with any MH/SA diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] codes 290.00-312.99, 316.00-316.99). We derived diagnostic categories from ICD-CM codes using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition definitions, clinical input, and empiric analyses. Weighted least-squares regression models were developed for concurrent (FY99) and prospective (FY00) MH/SA costs and utilization. We compared the predictive ability of the PsyCMS with several case-mix systems, including adjusted clinical groups, diagnostic cost groups, and the chronic illness and disability payment system. Model performance was evaluated using R-squares and mean absolute prediction errors (MAPEs). Patients with MH/SA diagnoses comprised 29.6% of individuals seen in the VA during FY99. The PsyCMS accounted for a distinct proportion of the variance in concurrent and prospective MH/SA costs (R=0.11 and 0.06, respectively), outpatient MH/SA utilization (R=0.25 and 0.07), and inpatient MH/SA utilization (R=0.13 and 0.05). The PsyCMS performed better than other case-mix systems examined with slightly higher R-squares and lower MAPEs. The PsyCMS has clinically meaningful categories, demonstrates good predictive ability for modeling concurrent and prospective MH/SA costs and utilization, and thus represents a useful method for predicting mental health costs and utilization.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Modifying Risk Adjustment Models on Rankings of Access to Care in the VA Mental Health Report CardPsychiatric Services, 2002
- Diagnostic Cost Groups (DCGs) and Concurrent Utilization among Patients with Substance Abuse DisordersHealth Services Research, 2002
- Comparing alternative risk-adjustment models.The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 2001
- Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health Outcomes: An Application in VA Long term CareAmerican Journal of Medical Quality, 2001
- From Clinical Trials to Real-World Practice: Use of Atypical Antipsychotic Medication Nationally in the Department of Veterans AffairsMedical Care, 2001
- Risk adjustment of capitation payments to behavioral health care carve-outs: how well do existing methodologies account for psychiatric disability?Health Care Management Science, 2000
- Does managing behavioral health care services increase the cost of providing medical care?The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 1999
- Inpatient Psychiatric Treatment of Elderly Medicare BeneficiariesPsychiatric Services, 1998
- How well do Ambulatory Care Groups predict expenditures on mental health and substance abuse patients?Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1997
- Ambulatory care casemix measuresJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1995