Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening
- 1 June 2011
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Acta Radiologica
- Vol. 52 (5), 481-487
- https://doi.org/10.1258/ar.2011.100357
Abstract
Background Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) represents a challenge in mammographic screening due to its unknown progression into invasive cancer. The majority of the DCIS is detected due to signs of calcifications on the mammograms. Purpose To analyze the combinations of mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications by Van Nuys nuclear grade (grade). Material and Methods A total of 217 DCIS diagnosed in women aged 50–69 years old who participated in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program in the period November 1995 to December 2007 were reviewed by four breast imaging specialists. The mammograms were classified according to the morphology and distribution of the calcifications, using BI-RADS nomenclature. Chi square test was used to compare the groups of morphology and distribution by grade. Results Calcifications were identified in 93% (202/217) of the cases, 15% (30/202) as grade 1 and 74% (149/202) as grade 3. Fine pleomorphic calcifications were seen in 38% (77/202) of the lesions and fine linear and fine linear branching in 31% (62/202). Sixty-nine percent (53/77) of the fine pleomorphic and 84% (52/62) of the fine linear and fine linear branching calcifications were high grade lesions. Grouped distribution was seen in about half of all the cases (104/202). Among the high grade lesions with fine pleomorphic or fine linear and fine linear branching calcifications, 75% (40/53) and 69% (36/52), respectively, had grouped or segmental distribution. Conclusion DCIS presented overlapping groups of morphology and distribution of calcification by grade, but fine pleomorphic and fine linear and fine linear branching calcifications with grouped and segmental distributions were associated with high grade DCIS. Seeking for further knowledge that allows separation of non-high grade from high grade DCIS has to continue to improve the quality of mammographic screening.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ: The effect of a population-based screening programmeThe Breast, 2010
- Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Systematic Review of Incidence, Treatment, and OutcomesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breastBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008
- The molecular journey from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancerCancer, 2008
- The Sea of Uncertainty Surrounding Ductal Carcinoma In Situ--The Price of Screening MammographyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Pathologic Variables Predictive of Breast Events in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In SituAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2007
- Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsyCancer, 2005
- Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Women Undergoing Screening MammographyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): overdiagnosis or an obligate precursor of invasive disease?Journal of Medical Screening, 2001
- Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15–25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsyCancer, 1995