Clinicopathologic Characteristics, CpG Island Methylator Phenotype, and BRAF Mutations in Microsatellite-Stable Colorectal Cancers Without Chromosomal Instability
Open Access
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine in Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
- Vol. 132 (6), 958-964
- https://doi.org/10.5858/2008-132-958-cccimp
Abstract
Context.—The 2 chief pathways implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis, microsatellite instability and chromosomal instability, are not present in 20% to 37% of cases. Objective.—To determine whether the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) pathway, characterized by simultaneous methylation of several known tumor suppressor genes, is the principal underlying mechanism in cases without chromosomal or microsatellite instability, and to determine the significance of CIMP pathway and BRAF mutations in microsatellite-stable (MSS) cases. Design.—Clinicopathologic features and chromosomal instability status by loss of heterozygosity analysis were determined in 83 cases of colorectal cancer in which microsatellite instability, CIMP status, BRAF mutations, and KRAS mutations were previously known. Results.—Microsatellite instability was present in 14 cases (17%). Of the 69 MSS cases (83%), chromosomal instability manifested by LOH involving at least one locus was observed in 53 cases (64%). Hence, 16 (19%) of 83 colorectal cancer cases showed neither microsatellite instability nor chromosomal instability. These cases had a low incidence of CIMP (3/16; 19%) and BRAF mutation (1/16; 6%). The 5-year survival in these cases was significantly better compared with MSS cases with chromosomal instability (80% vs 54%, P = .02). BRAF mutations were identified in 10 MSS cases (15%). BRAF mutation in MSS cases correlated significantly with high-level chromosomal instability (P = .009) and poor 5-year survival (0% vs 70%, P < .001). Conclusions.—CIMP does not appear to play a key role in colorectal cancer without microsatellite instability and chromosomal instability. These cases have a better survival, probably related to absence of significant chromosomal instability. BRAF mutations in MSS cases are associated with high levels of chromosomal instability that are likely responsible for the adverse outcomes in these cases.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- The CpG Island Methylator Phenotype and Chromosomal Instability Are Inversely Correlated in Sporadic Colorectal CancerGastroenterology, 2007
- CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancerNature Genetics, 2006
- BRAF mutation, CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability occur more frequently and concordantly in mucinous than non‐mucinous colorectal cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 2006
- CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) of colorectal cancer is best characterised by quantitative DNA methylation analysis and prospective cohort studiesGut, 2006
- CIMP, at LastGastroenterology, 2005
- Array-CGH analysis of microsatellite-stable, near-diploid bowel cancers and comparison with other types of colorectal carcinomaOncogene, 2004
- Colorectal cancer without high microsatellite instability and chromosomal instability--an alternative genetic pathway to human colorectal cancerCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 2003
- Genetic profiling of colorectal cancer liver metastases by combined comparative genomic hybridization and G‐banding analysisGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 2002
- Heterogeneity studies identify a subset of sporadic colorectal cancers without evidence for chromosomal or microsatellite instabilityOncogene, 1999
- Loss of Heterozygosity in Normal Tissue Adjacent to Breast CarcinomasScience, 1996