Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable
- 9 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 214 (1), 79-90.e36
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 168 references indexed in Scilit:
- First-Trimester Prediction of Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Women at Low RiskObstetrics & Gynecology, 2012
- First-trimester placental protein 13, PAPP-A, uterine artery Doppler and maternal characteristics in the prediction of pre-eclampsiaPlacenta, 2011
- Proteomic identification of serum peptides predicting subsequent spontaneous preterm birthAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Using a Simplified Bishop Score to Predict Vaginal DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Evaluating Prediction Models (But Were Too Afraid to Ask)Urology, 2010
- Performance of messenger RNAs circulating in maternal blood in the prediction of preeclampsia at 10-14 weeksAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
- Prepregnancy Risk Factors for Antepartum Stillbirth in the United StatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
- Predicting the risk of pre‐eclampsia between 11 and 13 weeks' gestation by combining maternal characteristics and serum analytes, PAPP‐A and free β‐hCGPrenatal Diagnosis, 2010
- Does Information Available at Admission for Delivery Improve Prediction of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean?American Journal of Perinatology, 2009
- Epidemiology and causes of preterm birthThe Lancet, 2008