A Systematic Review of the Attributes and Outcomes of Peer Work and Guidelines for Reporting Studies of Peer Interventions
- 31 August 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in Psychiatric Services
- Vol. 69 (9), 961-977
- https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700564
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this review was to describe key attributes and outcome measures reported in controlled trials of peer work, identify outcome measures likely to report significant change as a result of peer work, assess the quality of reporting, and formulate guidelines for the design and reporting of future trials. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials of peer work published since 1995. A content analysis identified reported program attributes in seven areas. Outcome measures were compared with results to identify measures most likely to report a significant difference as a result of peer work. Descriptions of program attributes were rated with respect to how clearly they were specified by authors. Results: A total of 37 studies were included. Program attributes varied widely, particularly the services that peers delivered and the outcomes measured. Outcome measures were limited to measures of individual clinical improvement and recovery rather than social and structural impacts. Outcomes that more often showed significant differences as a result of peer work were patient activation, self-efficacy, empowerment, and hope. Gaps in reporting of the attributes of peer work programs were identified and used to formulate guidelines for the design of future trials. Conclusions: Lack of attention to fidelity to core peer work principles and aims in the design and reporting of effectiveness trials limits the utility of research to policy and practice. The proposed guidelines will help future researchers to capture the unique value of peer work for individual and systemic change.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized controlled trial of peer-led recovery education using Building Recovery of Individual Dreams and Goals through Education and Support (BRIDGES)Schizophrenia Research, 2012
- Consumer Empowerment and Self-Advocacy Outcomes in a Randomized Study of Peer-Led EducationCommunity Mental Health Journal, 2012
- Recovery in the USA: From politics to peer supportInternational Review of Psychiatry, 2012
- A review of the literature on peer support in mental health servicesJournal of Mental Health, 2011
- Effect of home-based peer support on maternal-infant interactions among women with postpartum depression: A randomized, controlled trialInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2011
- The Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) Program: A peer-led intervention to improve medical self-management for persons with serious mental illnessSchizophrenia Research, 2010
- Study protocol: The development of a pilot study employing a randomised controlled design to investigate the feasibility and effects of a peer support program following discharge from a specialist first-episode psychosis treatment centreBMC Psychiatry, 2010
- How to support peer support: evaluating the first steps in a healthcare communityJournal of Public Mental Health, 2010
- Empowerment and peer support: structure and process of self‐help in a consumer‐run center for individuals with mental illnessJournal of Community Psychology, 2009
- Supported socialization for people with psychiatric disabilities: Lessons from a randomized controlled trialJournal of Community Psychology, 2004