Reproducibility of Survey Results from a Study of Occupation-Related Respiratory Health in the Aluminum Industry
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Vol. 17 (11), 774-782
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220290096023
Abstract
Confidence in dose-response relationships arising from occupational studies is dependent upon the reliability and validity of relevant exposure and morbidity estimates. Often self-reported occupational histories are a surrogate for direct exposure measures, and self-report of symptoms serves a similar purpose in place of more objective measures of morbidity. Unfortunately, there are few methods for validating either of these sources of information. This study attempts to evaluate the reproducibility of a survey instrument, and resulting cumulative exposure estimates, utilized in a study of work-related respiratory morbidity in the aluminum industry. The survey instrument comprised measures of pulmonary function, atopic status, smoking, occupational history, and respiratory symptoms. A Task Exposure Matrix was used to estimate exposure categories and cumulative exposure scores. Two groups of employees were administered the survey instrument on two separate occasions. Group A (n = 74) completed their two surveys more than ten weeks apart and Group B (n = 43) completed their surveys less than two weeks apart. Reproducibility was assessed using Cohen's Kappa for categorically measured outcome measures and intraclass correlation coefficients for continuously measured outcomes. Agreement across most variables, for both groups, was generally high. Repeatability of self-reported respiratory symptoms ranged from 70 to 98 percent (Group A) and 88 to 100 percent (Group B). Cumulative exposure scores were highly reproducible, despite some discrepancies in the self-reported occupational histories across interviews, with most of the calculated intraclass r scores exceeding 0.8. These results give strength to studies reporting dose-response relationships derived from similarly collected data. Reproducibility of the survey data was enhanced by use of standardized questionnaire material, consistent interview structure, and calibrated equipment for objective observation. In particular the authors recommend use of a company job dictionary to optimize reproducibility of self-reported occupational information.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond the job exposure matrix (JEM): the task exposure matrix (TEM)Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 2000
- Respiratory symptoms and lung function in two prebake aluminum smeltersAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1999
- Reliability of Reported Occupational History Information for US Coal Miners, 1969-1977American Journal of Epidemiology, 1998
- Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Validation of Work Histories for the Purpose of Epidemiological StudiesApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1991
- Validity of occupational histories obtained by interview with female workersAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1991
- A STUDY OF THE ACCURACY OF CANCER RISK FACTOR INFORMATION REPORTED TO A CENTRAL REGISTRY COMPARED WITH THAT OBTAINED BY INTERVIEWAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1989
- Bias in analytic researchJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1979
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960