Comparison of two instruments for assessing communication skills in a general practice objective structured clinical examination
- 1 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 41 (7), 676-683
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02788.x
Abstract
In recent decades, there has been increased interest in tools for assessing and improving the communication skills of general practice trainees. Recently, experts in the field rated the older Maas Global (MG) and the newer Common Ground (CG) instruments among the better communication skills assessment tools. This report seeks to establish their cross-validityKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acquisition of communication skills in postgraduate training for general practice.Medical Education, 2004
- A reliability study of an instrument for measuring general practitioner consultation skills: the LIV-MAAS scale.International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2003
- Psychometric MethodsPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2002
- Assessment of Non-Cognitive FactorsPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2002
- Impact of patient feedback on the interpersonal skills of general practice registrars: results of a longitudinal study.Medical Education, 2001
- Retention and Use of Patient-centered Interviewing Skills after Intensive TrainingAcademic Medicine, 2001
- Patient-physician communication assessment instruments:Patient Education and Counseling, 1998
- The Effectiveness of Intensive Training for Residents in InterviewingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Evaluating Communication SkillsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 1998
- Reliability and feasibility of measuring medical interviewing skills: the revised Maastricht History-Taking and Advice ChecklistMedical Education, 1991