Dropping the Baton: Specialty Referrals in the United States
Top Cited Papers
- 21 March 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in The Milbank Quarterly
- Vol. 89 (1), 39-68
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x
Abstract
In the United States, more than a third of patients are referred to a specialist each year, and specialist visits constitute more than half of outpatient visits. Despite the frequency of referrals and the importance of the specialty-referral process, the process itself has been a long-standing source of frustration among both primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists. These frustrations, along with a desire to lower costs, have led to numerous strategies to improve the specialty-referral process, such as using gatekeepers and referral guidelines. This article reviews the literature on the specialty-referral process in order to better understand what is known about current problems with the referral process and what solutions have been proposed. The article first provides a conceptual framework and then reviews prior literature on the referral decision, care coordination including information transfer, and access to specialty care. PCPs vary in their threshold for referring a patient, which results in both the underuse and the overuse of specialists. Many referrals do not include a transfer of information, either to or from the specialist; and when they do, it often contains insufficient data for medical decision making. Care across the primary-specialty interface is poorly integrated; PCPs often do not know whether a patient actually went to the specialist, or what the specialist recommended. PCPs and specialists also frequently disagree on the specialist's role during the referral episode (e.g., single consultation or continuing co-management). There are breakdowns and inefficiencies in all components of the specialty-referral process. Despite many promising mechanisms to improve the referral process, rigorous evaluations of these improvements are needed.Keywords
This publication has 124 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Electronic Referrals for Specialty Care at a Public HospitalJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- A Nationwide Survey of Patient Centered Medical Home Demonstration ProjectsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Patient Outcomes at 26 Months in the Patient-Centered Medical Home National Demonstration ProjectAnnals of Family Medicine, 2010
- A Web-based Generalist–Specialist System to Improve Scheduling of Outpatient Specialty Consultations in an Academic CenterJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Not Perfect, but Better: Primary Care Providers’ Experiences with Electronic Referrals in a Safety Net Health SystemJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Ambulatory Care Provided by Office-Based Specialists in the United StatesAnnals of Family Medicine, 2009
- Patient Experiences with Coordination of Care: The Benefit of Continuity and Primary Care Physician as Referral SourceJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Coordinating Care — A Perilous Journey through the Health Care SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- A systematic review of patient and health system characteristics associated with late referral in chronic kidney diseaseBMC Nephrology, 2008
- Group Visits: Promoting Adherence to Diabetes GuidelinesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007