Speakers' Footing in a Collaborative Writing Task: A Resource for Addressing Disagreement While Avoiding Conflict
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Research on Language and Social Interaction
- Vol. 35 (4), 481-514
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3504_4
Abstract
It is widely assumed in studies of conflict that either persons address and resolve disagreement by waging conflict or that persons avoid conflict and thereby fail to address disagreements. However, through our analysis of interactions of people engaged in a collaborative writing task, we found a number of instances where steps were taken to avoid waging conflict or to attenuate it when there was disagreement while still addressing the disagreement and seeking to resolve it. This was done by making use of the alternative footings of speakers engaged in collaboration on a writing task to wage conflict indirectly, off the record. Speakers faced with disagreement changed or adopted footings so as to secure or reify accord or avoid further discord. Three functions of adopting or changing footings when disagreements arise are identified.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Individual Voice in LanguageAnnual Review of Anthropology, 2000
- The Effect of Contributing Substantively on Perceptions of ParticipationSmall Group Research, 2000
- Collaborative Construction of Task Activity: Coordinating Multiple Resources in a High School Physics LabResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 1999
- Irony in conversationLanguage in Society, 1999
- The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identityLanguage in Society, 1999
- Participant Roles, Frames, and Speech ActsLinguistics and Philosophy, 1999
- Using completion to formulate a statement collectivelyJournal of Pragmatics, 1996
- Keeping your footing: Conversational completion in three-part sequencesJournal of Pragmatics, 1996
- Linguistic politeness:: Current research issuesJournal of Pragmatics, 1990
- The rules of social relationshipsBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 1985