Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section
- 1 November 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in European Journal of Anaesthesiology
- Vol. 33 (11), 853-865
- https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000535
Abstract
The frequency of caesarean section has increased dramatically in recent decades. Despite this, robust data regarding the consequences of caesarean section in terms of developing chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) are still lacking. This systematic review analysed the incidence and severity of CPSP in women 3 to less than 6, 6 to less than 12, and at least 12 months after caesarean section. Systematic review of prospective and retrospective observational studies and randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE to May 2015. We included all studies investigating the incidence and/or severity of CPSP at least 3 months after caesarean section. The primary outcome was chronic postsurgical wound pain (CPSP ‘wound’). Secondary outcomes were persistent pain in the back area, pelvic region or reported as residual pain, and severity of ‘birth-related’ chronic pain. Meta-analysis using the random-effects model based on 15 studies (n = 4475) reporting CPSP ‘wound’ at 3 to less than 6 months after caesarean section revealed an incidence of 15.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.9 to 20.9%]. For 6 to less than 12 and at least 12 months after caesarean section, the incidence of CPSP ‘wound’ was estimated at 11.5% (95% CI: 8.1 to 15.0%, n = 3345) and 11.2% (95% CI: 7.4 to 15.0%, n = 3451), respectively. Meta-regression analysis using the publication year as predictor revealed stable CPSP ‘wound’ incidences at each postoperative time slot from 2002 to the present. Of those patients who reported chronic pain, 9.6% (95% CI: 0.0 to 21.0%) had severe pain, 23.5% (95% CI: 10.0 to 37.0%) had moderate pain and 49.2% (95% CI: 18.9 to 79.4%) had mild pain at 6 months. Major limitations are high statistical heterogeneity of the meta-analyses and inconsistencies in reporting severity of chronic ‘birth-related’ pain. This meta-analysis finds a clinically relevant incidence of CPSP ‘wound’ after caesarean section ranging from 15% at 3 months to 11% at 12 months or longer that has been largely stable in recent years.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Efficacy of 2 Doses of Epidural Morphine for Postcesarean Delivery AnalgesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2013
- A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesiaInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2012
- Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, ChinaBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2010
- Predictive Risk Factors for Persistent Postherniotomy PainAnesthesiology, 2010
- Intraperitoneal Lidocaine Instillation and Postcesarean Pain After Parietal Peritoneal ClosureThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2010
- Postoperative Analgesic Effects of Continuous Wound Infiltration with Diclofenac after Elective Cesarean DeliveryAnesthesiology, 2007
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Epidural anaesthesia and long term backache after childbirth.BMJ, 1990