Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model
- 21 January 2011
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 377 (9761), 219-227
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61351-7
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- United Nations Development Programme
- World Health Organization
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- United Nations Population Fund
- Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
- Preeclampsia Foundation
- Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting
- World Bank Group
- Child and Family Research Institute
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal†Human Reproduction Update, 2009
- Tests for predicting complications of pre-eclampsia: A protocol for systematic reviewsBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2008
- Reducing eclampsia-related deaths—a call to actionThe Lancet, 2008
- Non-proteinuric pre-eclampsia: a novel risk indicator in women with gestational hypertensionJournal of Hypertension, 2008
- Editorial: What to do with Missing Data?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2007
- Current CHS and NHBPEP Criteria for Severe Preeclampsia Do Not Uniformly Predict Adverse Maternal or Perinatal OutcomesHypertension in Pregnancy, 2007
- Stroke and Severe Preeclampsia and Eclampsia: A Paradigm Shift Focusing on Systolic Blood PressureObstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre-eclampsiaPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Bootstrap biasBiometrika, 1990
- Clinical Prediction RulesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1985