Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 26 April 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Health Research Policy and Systems
- Vol. 15 (1), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x
Abstract
There is extensive health and public health literature on the ‘evidence-policy gap’, exploring the frustrating experiences of scientists trying to secure a response to the problems and solutions they raise and identifying the need for better evidence to reduce policymaker uncertainty. We offer a new perspective by using policy theory to propose research with greater impact, identifying the need to use persuasion to reduce ambiguity, and to adapt to multi-level policymaking systems. We identify insights from secondary data, namely systematic reviews, critical analysis and policy theories relevant to evidence-based policymaking. The studies are drawn primarily from countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. We combine empirical and normative elements to identify the ways in which scientists can, do and could influence policy. We identify two important dilemmas, for scientists and researchers, that arise from our initial advice. First, effective actors combine evidence with manipulative emotional appeals to influence the policy agenda – should scientists do the same, or would the reputational costs outweigh the policy benefits? Second, when adapting to multi-level policymaking, should scientists prioritise ‘evidence-based’ policymaking above other factors? The latter includes governance principles such the ‘co-production’ of policy between local public bodies, interest groups and service users. This process may be based primarily on values and involve actors with no commitment to a hierarchy of evidence. We conclude that successful engagement in ‘evidence-based policymaking’ requires pragmatism, combining scientific evidence with governance principles, and persuasion to translate complex evidence into simple stories. To maximise the use of scientific evidence in health and public health policy, researchers should recognise the tendency of policymakers to base judgements on their beliefs, and shortcuts based on their emotions and familiarity with information; learn ‘where the action is’, and be prepared to engage in long-term strategies to be able to influence policy; and, in both cases, decide how far you are willing to go to persuade policymakers to act and secure a hierarchy of evidence underpinning policy. These are value-driven and political, not just ‘evidence-based’, choices.Keywords
Funding Information
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L003325/1)
This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit:
- A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakersBMC Health Services Research, 2014
- Balancing exploration and exploitation in transferring research into practice: a comparison of five knowledge translation entity archetypesImplementation Science, 2013
- Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation researchImplementation Science, 2013
- The NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategyImplementation Science, 2011
- Implementing health research through academic and clinical partnerships: a realistic evaluation of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC)Implementation Science, 2011
- Research and Advice Giving: A Functional View of Evidence‐Informed Policy Advice in a Canadian Ministry of HealthThe Milbank Quarterly, 2009
- Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy ChangePolicy Studies Journal, 2009
- Maximising engagement, motivation and long term change in a Structured Intensive Education Programme in Diabetes for children, young people and their families: Child and Adolescent Structured Competencies Approach to Diabetes Education (CASCADE)BMC Pediatrics, 2009
- Involving Services Users in Social Work Training on the Reality of Family Poverty: A Case Study of a Collaborative ProjectSocial Work Education, 2008
- Health promotion, advocacy and health inequalities: a conceptual frameworkHealth Promotion International, 2000