Editing, Fast and Slow
- 7 December 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Journalism Practice
- Vol. 10 (4), 555-567
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1114898
Abstract
I first used “slow journalism” in 2007 to describe storytelling that gives equal value to narrative and factual discovery. My contribution was original in one respect: using management theory, it evaluated slow journalism as an example of high-margin journalism at the luxury end of the market, compared to high-volume news at the other, or conventional journalism in the middle. In that sense, slow journalism can be understood as a way of beating the competition through differentiation. An awareness of markets offers an additional frame for understanding slow journalism, alongside others that emphasise its potential as a communal project. However, it is not a binary choice: the best insights arise from understanding the tension between opposites, such as financial and cultural capital (Bourdieu) or ulterior and ultimate motives (Burke). A focus on the editing of slow journalism helps to understand these tensions. It also provides a lens through which to view time. Editing, now commonly seen as an extra stage that slows textual production, first emerged as a way of speeding it up. An historical awareness of the material conditions of production can help distinguish between constraints that are specifically commercial, and those arising from a wider social production of texts.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Editors Talk about EditingPublished by Peter Lang, International Academic Publishers ,2015
- What is Slow Journalism?Journalism Practice, 2014
- The New Journalism and the struggle for interpretationJournalism, 2014
- A New Republic of LettersPublished by Harvard University Press ,2014
- “The Facts—the Color!—the Facts”: The Idea of a Report in American Print Culture, 1885–1910Book History, 2012