Consequence analysis—Using a CFD model for industrial sites
- 9 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Process Safety Progress
- Vol. 24 (4), 316-272
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.10068
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- FLACS CFD air quality model performance evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU observationsAtmospheric Environment, 2004
- Comparisons between FLUENT and ADMS for atmospheric dispersion modellingAtmospheric Environment, 2004
- Comparisons of model simulations with observations of mean flow and turbulence within simple obstacle arraysAtmospheric Environment, 2002
- Investigation of Gas Dispersion and Explosions in Offshore ModulesPublished by Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) ,2002
- Wind Flow and Vapor Cloud Dispersion at Industrial and Urban SitesPublished by Wiley ,2002
- Use of the Kit Fox field data to analyze dense gas dispersion modeling issuesAtmospheric Environment, 2001
- Investigations to improve and assess the accuracy of computational fluid dynamic based explosion modelsJournal of Hazardous Materials, 1996
- Explosion propagation of non-homogeneous methane—air clouds inside an obstructed 50 m3 vented vesselJournal of Hazardous Materials, 1988
- Gas explosion experiments in 1:33 and 1:5 scale offshore separator and compressor modules using stoichiometric homogeneous fuel/air cloudsJournal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1988
- Computer Simulation of Turbulent Reactive Gas DynamicsModeling, Identification and Control: A Norwegian Research Bulletin, 1984