Co‐introduction vs ecological fitting as pathways to the establishment of effective mutualisms during biological invasions
- 18 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in New Phytologist
- Vol. 215 (4), 1354-1360
- https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14593
Abstract
Interactions between non-native plants and their mutualists are often disrupted upon introduction to new environments. Using legume–rhizobium mutualistic interactions as an example, we discuss two pathways that can influence symbiotic associations in such situations: co-introduction of coevolved rhizobia; and utilization of, and adaptation to, resident rhizobia, hereafter referred to as ‘ecological fitting’. Co-introduction and ecological fitting have distinct implications for successful legume invasions and their impacts. Under ecological fitting, initial impacts may be less severe and will accrue over longer periods as novel symbiotic associations and/or adaptations may require fine-tuning over time. Co-introduction will have more profound impacts that will accrue more rapidly as a result of positive feedbacks between densities of non-native rhizobia and their coevolved host plants, in turn enhancing competition between native and non-native rhizobia. Co-introduction can further impact invasion outcomes by the exchange of genetic material between native and non-native rhizobia, potentially resulting in decreased fitness of native legumes. A better understanding of the roles of these two pathways in the invasion dynamics of non-native legumes is much needed, and we highlight some of the exciting research avenues it presents.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Research Foundation (93591, 89967)
- National Research Foundation (93591, 89967)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mixed Nodule Infection in Sinorhizobium meliloti–Medicago sativa Symbiosis Suggest the Presence of Cheating BehaviorFrontiers in Plant Science, 2016
- Nitrogen‐fixing bacterial communities in invasive legume nodules and associated soils are similar across introduced and native range populations in AustraliaJournal of Biogeography, 2016
- Native Lespedeza species harbor greater non-rhizobial bacterial diversity in root nodules compared to the coexisting invader, L. cuneataPlant and Soil, 2015
- Ecological role of bacterial inoculants and their potential impact on soil microbial diversityPlant and Soil, 2015
- Partner diversity and identity impacts on plant productivity in Acacia–rhizobial interactionsJournal of Ecology, 2014
- What explains variation in the impacts of exotic plant invasions on the nitrogen cycle? A meta‐analysisEcology Letters, 2013
- Mutualisms are not constraining cross‐continental invasion success of Acacia species within AustraliaDiversity and Distributions, 2012
- Effects of soil biota from different ranges onRobiniainvasion: acquiring mutualists and escaping pathogensEcology, 2011
- Disentangling the Web of LifeScience, 2009
- β‐Rhizobia from Mimosa pigra, a newly discovered invasive plant in TaiwanNew Phytologist, 2005