Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 77 (916), 312-314
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/84593467
Abstract
Observer variability in interpretation of mammograms is a well-known problem, especially for microcalcifications. The classification of the mammographic findings depends upon this interpretation. We performed an intraobserver study to evaluate a breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) based method for description and classification of non-palpable lesions with microcalcifications. A set of 100 non-palpable mammographic lesions mainly consisting of microcalcifications was described and classified on two occasions, by two radiologists at an interval of 6 months. The intraobserver variability was evaluated with kappa statistics. The overall agreement for the classification was moderate (kappa 0.54). The lowest kappa values were observed for the categories “probably benign (BI-RADS 3, kappa 0.59)” and “suspicious abnormality (BI-RADS 4, kappa 0.44)”. The clinical management (follow-up or biopsy) of non-palpable lesions consisting of microcalcifications depending upon radiological classification in the groups BI-RADS 3 (follow-up) and BI-RADS 4 (biopsy) is therefore debatable.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large‐core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: Results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmationInternational Journal of Cancer, 2002
- Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- The Accuracy of Mammographic InterpretationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of MammogramsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Stability of malignant breast microcalcifications.Radiology, 1994
- The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical DataBiometrics, 1977