Examination of the Item Structure of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Pediatric Physical Therapy
- Vol. 16 (1), 31-38
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pep.0000114843.92102.98
Abstract
Purpose The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) is a screening tool for identifying delayed motor development from birth to 18 months of age. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric structure of the AIMS, including the hierarchical scale of items and the precision for measuring infant ability at different ages. Methods Ninety-seven infants with varying degrees of risk of developmental disability were recruited from three hospitals or from the community in the Chicago metropolitan area. Infants were tested on the AIMS at three, six, nine, and 12 months of age. The hierarchical structure and the range and distribution of item difficulty on the AIMS were analyzed using Rasch psychometric analysis. Results The Rasch analysis confirmed that items for each of the four testing positions (supine, prone, sitting, and standing) were arranged in increasing order of difficulty, but a ceiling effect was present. Gaps exist at six ability levels, indicating low precision of measurement for differentiating among infants after about nine months of age. Conclusions The AIMS shows a ceiling effect, measures infant ability best from three to nine months of age, and has few items available for discriminating among infants after they pass the controlled lowering through standing item. Clinical impressions should be drawn with caution at ages when the precision of measurement is low.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE USES AND ABUSES OF RELIABILITY MEASURES IN DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINEDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2008
- Longitudinal Performance of Infants with Cerebral Palsy on the Test of Infant Motor Performance and on the Alberta Infant Motor ScalePhysical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 2003
- Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor ScaleDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 2002
- Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcomeThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2001
- Concurrent Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance with the Alberta Infant Motor ScalePediatric Physical Therapy, 2000
- The Use of Rasch Analysis To Produce Scale-Free Measurement of Functional AbilityAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1999
- Test-Retest Reliability of the Test of Infant Motor PerformancePediatric Physical Therapy, 1999
- Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infantsEarly Human Development, 1998
- Critique of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS)Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 1996
- A Simplified Risk-Scoring System for PrematurityAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1986