Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients
Open Access
- 10 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 37 (2), 233-240
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2098-8
Abstract
Second-generation FloTrac software has been shown to reliably measure cardiac output (CO) in cardiac surgical patients. However, concerns have been raised regarding its accuracy in vasoplegic states. The aim of the present multicenter study was to investigate the accuracy of the third-generation software in patients with sepsis, particularly when total systemic vascular resistance (TSVR) is low. Fifty-eight septic patients were included in this prospective observational study in four university-affiliated ICUs. Reference CO was measured by bolus pulmonary thermodilution (iCO) using 3–5 cold saline boluses. Simultaneously, CO was computed from the arterial pressure curve recorded on a computer using the second-generation (COG2) and third-generation (COG3) FloTrac software. CO was also measured by semi-continuous pulmonary thermodilution (CCO). A total of 401 simultaneous measurements of iCO, COG2, COG3, and CCO were recorded. The mean (95%CI) biases between COG2 and iCO, COG3 and iCO, and CCO and iCO were −10 (−15 to −5)% [−0.8 (−1.1 to −0.4) L/min], 0 (−4 to 4)% [0 (−0.3 to 0.3) L/min], and 9 (6–13)% [0.7 (0.5–1.0) L/min], respectively. The percentage errors were 29 (20–37)% for COG2, 30 (24–37)% for COG3, and 28 (22–34)% for CCO. The difference between iCO and COG2 was significantly correlated with TSVR (r 2 = 0.37, p < 0.0001). A very weak (r 2 = 0.05) relationship was also observed for the difference between iCO and COG3. In patients with sepsis, the third-generation FloTrac software is more accurate, as precise, and less influenced by TSVR than the second-generation software.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo™ algorithm in cardiac surgery patientsCritical Care, 2009
- The cardiac output from blood pressure algorithms trial*Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Arterial Pulse Cardiac Output Agreement With Thermodilution in Patients in Hyperdynamic ConditionsJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2008
- The Effects of Vasodilation on Cardiac Output Measured by PiCCOJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2008
- Cardiac Output Measurement in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: Pulmonary Artery Catheter Versus Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform AnalysisAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2008
- Evaluation of a new arterial pressure-based cardiac output device requiring no external calibrationBMC Anesthesiology, 2007
- Pulse contour analysis: Fairy tale or new reality?*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- On the accuracy of intra-arterial pressure measurementCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Can We Trust the Direct Radial Artery Pressure Immediately Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass?Anesthesiology, 1985
- The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new modelJournal of Biomechanics, 1984