Information Loss in Emergency Medical Services Handover of Trauma Patients
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Prehospital Emergency Care
- Vol. 13 (3), 280-285
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120802706260
Abstract
Little is known about how effectively information is transferred from emergency medical services (EMS) personnel to clinicians in the emergency department receiving the patient. Information about prehospital events and findings can help ensure expedient and appropriate care. The trauma literature describes 16 prehospital data points that affect outcome and therefore should be included in the EMS report when applicable. To determine the degree to which information presented in the EMS trauma patient handover is degraded. At a level I trauma center, patients meeting criteria for the highest level of trauma team activation ("full trauma") were enrolled. As part of routine performance improvement, the physician leadership of the trauma program watched all available video-recorded full trauma responses, checking off whether the data points appropriate to the case were verbally "transmitted" by the EMS provider. Two EMS physicians then each independently reviewed the trauma team's chart notes for 50% of the sample (and a randomly selected 15% of the charts to assess agreement) and checked off whether the same elements were documented ("received") by the trauma team. The focus was on data elements that were "transmitted" but not "received." In 96 patient handovers, a total of 473 elements were transmitted, of which 329 were received (69.6%). On the average chart, 72.9% of the transmitted items were received (95% confidence interval 69.0%-76.8%). The most commonly transmitted data elements were mechanism of injury (94 times), anatomic location of injury (81), and age (67). Prehospital hypotension was received in only 10 of the 28 times it was transmitted; prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 10 of 22 times; and pulse rate 13 of 49 times. Even in the controlled setting of a single-patient handover with direct verbal contact between EMS providers and in-hospital clinicians, only 72.9% of the key prehospital data points that were transmitted by the EMS personnel were documented by the receiving hospital staff. Elements such as prehospital hypotension, GCS score, and other prehospital vital signs were often not recorded. Methods of "transmitting" and "receiving" data in trauma as well as all other patients need further scrutiny.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transfer of accountability: transforming shift handover to enhance patient safety.World Health & Population, 2006
- The Predictive Value of Field versus Arrival Glasgow Coma Scale Score and TRISS Calculations in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain InjuryJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2006
- Do Trauma Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale Score of 3 and Bilateral Fixed and Dilated Pupils Have Any Chance of Survival?Journal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2006
- Pre-Hospital Endotracheal Intubation and Positive Pressure Ventilation Is Associated with Hypotension and Decreased Survival in Hypovolemic Trauma Patients: An Analysis of the National Trauma Data BankJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2005
- The association between field glasgow coma scale score and outcome in patients undergoing paramedic rapid sequence intubationThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Prehospital Prediction of Intensive Care Unit Stay and Mortality in Blunt Trauma PatientsJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2005
- Prehospital End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Outcome in Major TraumaJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2004
- A Comparison of Prehospital and Hospital Data in Trauma PatientsJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2004
- Is Total Out-of-hospital Time a Significant Predictor of Trauma Patient Mortality?Academic Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Isolated prehospital hypotension after traumatic injuries: a predictor of mortality?The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2003